Ponies and rainbows. In Achaea. Where the blood flows deep, and the married women in the north consummate hard.
Give us -real- shop logs! Not another misinterpretation of features we ask for, turned into something that either doesn't help at all, or doesn't remotely resemble what we wanted to begin with.
Thanks!
Current position of some of the playerbase, instead of expressing a desire to fix problems:
Vhaynna: "Honest question - if you don't like Achaea or the current admin, why do you even bother playing?"
(D.M.A.): Cooper says, "Kyrra is either the most innocent person in the world, or the girl who uses the most innuendo seemingly unintentionally but really on purpose."
Also, if you are fishing in someone's grove and don't leave when they ask you, it's pretty right to eject them. That's spammy af and there's literally hundreds of non grove rooms to fish from.
Also, if you are fishing in someone's grove and don't leave when they ask you, it's pretty right to eject them. That's spammy af and there's literally hundreds of non grove rooms to fish from.
1) Wheel tarot, entirely different thing.
2) Still an offensive action, was my point. Whether you agree on that is irrelevant; forced movement is an offensive action.
Also, if you are fishing in someone's grove and don't leave when they ask you, it's pretty right to eject them. That's spammy af and there's literally hundreds of non grove rooms to fish from.
He was in the room first, though, so it's not like he went there to bother them. Groves aren't a forestal's personal property, either. I would've done the same. Eject is also most definitely an offensive action.
And refusing to leave a grove when asked could be seem as justification for said aggessive action, depending on the dialogue of course.
So you're saying if someone enters a room you were already in, and tells you to leave, you'd just up and walk away or accept they can attack? I don't think there's a lot of people who will accept that's proper justification to attack. Again, groves are not a forestal's personal property, so they have no right to ask anyone to leave.
And refusing to leave a grove when asked could be seem as justification for said aggessive action, depending on the dialogue of course.
I don't entirely disagree with this. However, if you opt to 'retaliate' then the person who refused to leave has every right to smash your face in. Like I did in the log.
Wasn't there a ruling that groves aren't private property so there is no possible way to be trespassing?
There's also this, though. You can politely ask them to leave your grove, as he did... The person you're asking doesn't have to oblige your wishes, however. If he demanded I left, I would've just PLAUGH'd him.
Dude, remember old groves and how fking bonkers they were? Elevate+Damage totem Swarm+Thorns+fast golem shield break spam Barrier+Entangle Cage+ ... what's the one that gave you forest wide Piety + not having lessons for survival because I wanted class skills Summon+Displace Heal on a like 5s tick Artied multiple grove lightning spam + summon Reflexes+perma offbal swing staff spam
9) TRESPASSING (c) PROPERTY OF INTEREST - property that is owned by no one in particular, but has been administratively declared defendable by those with a specific interest in the property against trespass. All those with the defined interest has cause against trespassers until they leave.
At this time, the only properties of interest are: 1) groves, which are properties of interest to the imprinter alone; 2) any room or series of rooms accessible through a specific skill that is designed to take the skill user to that room or series of rooms only, and nowhere else. All users with that skill have cause against any trespassers who do not have that skill. Rooms that can be reached through non-magical means (such as walking) do not fall under this definition. Nirvana, the Chaos Plane, the Inferno, and Glade of Isolation are examples of what does fall under this definition as group interest property.
That was under pk rules, but it definitely translates to grove owners today having a roleplay justification to attack someone in their grove they do not want there. I mean your golem will straight up attack everyone on your enemy list automatically, the whole point is forestals have a say on defending their grove spot.
That was under pk rules, but it definitely translates to grove owners today having a roleplay justification to attack someone in their grove they do not want there. I mean your golem will straight up attack everyone on your enemy list automatically, the whole point is forestals have a say on defending their grove spot.
Bolded is all that really needs to be pointed out. I will point out in addition though, that he was fishing. That guy wasn't defending against anything, he was just being a dick.
Comments
Use what you can
Some people are just never happy..
Results of disembowel testing | Knight limb counter | GMCP AB files
Oh @Reyson spoke the wisdom.
We gotchu fam.
And yes, I am fully aware I could have been more... Polite about it. Dun bother me when I'm fishing.
Also, if you are fishing in someone's grove and don't leave when they ask you, it's pretty right to eject them. That's spammy af and there's literally hundreds of non grove rooms to fish from.
2) Still an offensive action, was my point. Whether you agree on that is irrelevant; forced movement is an offensive action.
There's also this, though. You can politely ask them to leave your grove, as he did... The person you're asking doesn't have to oblige your wishes, however. If he demanded I left, I would've just PLAUGH'd him.
Elevate+Damage totem
Swarm+Thorns+fast golem shield break spam
Barrier+Entangle
Cage+ ... what's the one that gave you forest wide Piety + not having lessons for survival because I wanted class skills
Summon+Displace
Heal on a like 5s tick
Artied multiple grove lightning spam + summon
Reflexes+perma offbal swing staff spam
I wouldn't fk with that chick
9) TRESPASSING
(c) PROPERTY OF INTEREST - property that is owned by no one in
particular, but has been administratively declared defendable by those
with a specific interest in the property against trespass. All those
with the defined interest has cause against trespassers until they leave.
At this time, the only properties of interest are: 1) groves, which are
properties of interest to the imprinter alone; 2) any room or series of
rooms accessible through a specific skill that is designed to take the
skill user to that room or series of rooms only, and nowhere else. All
users with that skill have cause against any trespassers who do not have
that skill. Rooms that can be reached through non-magical means (such as
walking) do not fall under this definition. Nirvana, the Chaos Plane, the
Inferno, and Glade of Isolation are examples of what does fall under this
definition as group interest property.
That was under pk rules, but it definitely translates to grove owners today having a roleplay justification to attack someone in their grove they do not want there. I mean your golem will straight up attack everyone on your enemy list automatically, the whole point is forestals have a say on defending their grove spot.