Howdy, Stranger!
Categories
- 6.2K All Categories
- 3.1K Everything Achaea
- 1.5K North of Thera
- 26 Archives of the Terraformer
- 257 The Matsuhama Arena
- 885 The Golden Dais of Creation
- 299 The Scarlattan Theatre
- 149 The Blank Canvas
- 2K Getting Help
- 412 General Questions
- 258 Quick Class Questions
- 1.3K Tech Support
- 313 Client Help
- 486 Curing Systems and Scripts
- 841 Off-Topic
- 255 The Wander Inn
- 586 The Universal Membrane
- 298 Class Discussions
- 298 Individual Class Sections
- 20 Alchemist
- 9 Apostate
- 30 Blademaster
- 9 Depthswalker
- 14 Druid
- 4 Infernal
- 20 Jester
- 19 Magi
- 34 Monk
- 11 Occultist
- 8 Paladin
- 7 Priest
- 29 Runewarden
- 18 Sentinel
- 26 Serpent
- 20 Shaman
- 9 Sylvan
Comments
Penwize has cowardly forfeited the challenge to mortal combat issued by Atalkez.
@Reyson is pretty historically known to other team leaders as someone who tries to organise fair fights OOC, as he would rather any response happen than no response at all. I don't think you know what you're talking about, but go off.
The point is that all soldiers (all players) have finite energy and interest, and expecting them to not play when they can, or to always be paragons of virtue, is silly. People will always point at other people, including me, so there needs to be some robustness to the system that rewards risky plays and doesn't all hinge on unspoken OOC sportsmanship. Who sets the rules and scoring for war IC? Can you explain it to me without breaking kayfabe? Trying to be perfectly even-handed and listen to all complaints from both cities is exhausting, as Sothantos would probably agree.
I am the liquor indeed.
Reaching down with a massive hand, Sartan lifts your head and draws a taloned finger across your throat, the wound closing as He does so.
I'd also argue it's not anyone's job to make sure the other team has fun. If you're not having fun, or are getting mad at things in a game, it's time to qq and take a breather until you feel better, I think. There's a big, big difference between "not worrying about the other side's every individual's idea of fun" and being proactively toxic and determined to make things unfun, for the record. And from what I've seen so far, not a single Targossian or Mhaldorian player falls in the latter category, even if we've all done semi-sketchy or full-on sketchy things.
I'm surprised there isn't any sort of ceasefire system in place given the duration of each War. Every few days a ceasefire will be implemented, wiping infamy, or ticking it down much faster than usual, and aggressive actions against each other won't apply to the next war report.
Then each city has a chance to recuperate, resupply, assess the latest reports, and plan ahead.
Granted, part of this could be done in-game between City Leaders. I know I'd want to be a fly on the wall as a Tyrannus and Dawnlord initiate a temporary ceasfire after meeting somewhere in neutral territory to trade snarky remarks and promise one another further destruction when the lull in warefare is over.
I'll bring the illegal weapons.
Aegis, God of War says, "You are dismissed from My demense, Astarod. Go forth and fight well. Bleed fiercely, and climb the purpose you have sought to chase for."
In your world, it is 2020/06/16 05:12:01 GMT
Is this lack of infamy intended?
edit: just checked previous day logs
Note: not complaining about my own infamy. I totally deserve it. Just seems like something weird might be up in the balancing/accrual.
Aegis, God of War says, "You are dismissed from My demense, Astarod. Go forth and fight well. Bleed fiercely, and climb the purpose you have sought to chase for."
EDIT: Not being passive aggressive, just saying why Crixos might not desire bounties as the outcome. (Same hinder we have now too)
Aegis, God of War says, "You are dismissed from My demense, Astarod. Go forth and fight well. Bleed fiercely, and climb the purpose you have sought to chase for."
Reaching down with a massive hand, Sartan lifts your head and draws a taloned finger across your throat, the wound closing as He does so.
Yes, you are. Not relevant here.
Constant participation (2 irl days) as the aggressor including killing guards, should make and keep you infamous as generally speaking, guard killings aren't commonplace.
It's mostly because I see them out and about without a care in the world after nonchalantly slaying blackrock cleric #12345. The threat of reprisal should always be there.
I'd be fine with infamy going down quickly if the person is dying(and not just hiding away to let it fade)
This notion that only one of us should be able to come after you for ganking guards and Citymates less than 24 hours ago seems super silly, to me. If you don't want to deal with the consequences of PvP, don't PvP, right? Any reason for generating such little infamy right now, @Makarios?
People are afraid of dying and as such are risk adverse.
The system encourages off peak raids/guard bashing
The system encourages ganking
The system discourages 1v1
The system discourages having fair raids
The system encourages hiding if not ganking/raiding
The system leaves little room for people without substantial earring networks, urns etc from doing much due to infamy
How does pk ruling even work here? Are all citizens allowed to attack invading raiders? Just soldiers? Is there any consequence to defending, or even raiding, without being a soldier? Obviously there's bounties and infamy for raiding, but... eh. Outside a war, I wouldn't care about this. I'd even be happy for more people to fight! But idk, this seems like a weird grey area where I don't know if I'm now allowed to attack the non-soldiers for messing with us, consider them hostile defenders from the start in future raids, or am not allowed to do jack until they suckerpunch me first. What's the rule here, @Makarios ?