Howdy, Stranger!
Categories
- 6.2K All Categories
- 3.1K Everything Achaea
- 1.5K North of Thera
- 26 Archives of the Terraformer
- 257 The Matsuhama Arena
- 885 The Golden Dais of Creation
- 299 The Scarlattan Theatre
- 149 The Blank Canvas
- 2K Getting Help
- 412 General Questions
- 258 Quick Class Questions
- 1.3K Tech Support
- 313 Client Help
- 486 Curing Systems and Scripts
- 841 Off-Topic
- 255 The Wander Inn
- 586 The Universal Membrane
- 298 Class Discussions
- 298 Individual Class Sections
- 20 Alchemist
- 9 Apostate
- 30 Blademaster
- 9 Depthswalker
- 14 Druid
- 4 Infernal
- 20 Jester
- 19 Magi
- 34 Monk
- 11 Occultist
- 8 Paladin
- 7 Priest
- 29 Runewarden
- 18 Sentinel
- 26 Serpent
- 20 Shaman
- 9 Sylvan
Comments
Penwize has cowardly forfeited the challenge to mortal combat issued by Atalkez.
We'd all agree that there are certain things that it makes sense to be publicly available, and other things that aren't. No one's pushing for house membership, order membership, or any number of other details (many of which, I'd argue, are more obvious then the name of your weapon) to be included in honours. The question, then, isn't so much whether there should be a line between things known and things not, but where that line should be.
What I don't like about the argument getting made is that it doesn't provide any justification why weapon names are more appropriately on the "known" side then the "unknown", it's just an argument that weapon names -could- be known because a subset of other things are.
Again, it's not like you can find out what the name is without being in the room/squint/observe range - really not seeing what the issue is. If you can justify knowing as much about a person as honours provides, from anywhere you choose to use it, there's no logical reason why you wouldn't also be able to justify knowing the name of their weapon once you are within a few rooms of them.
Penwize has cowardly forfeited the challenge to mortal combat issued by Atalkez.
Doesn't seem like there's a good reason why people are -wrong- to think it's dumb/pretentious/ostentatious/etc.
In the spirit of the thread- anyone have the room emotes (if any) of the ictheli mounts? Like, some horses'll shake their heads every so often, or something, stuff like that.
"Yeah my sister-"
"Which one? Sarah? Amanda? Charlotte?"
"...Wtf dude."
Results of disembowel testing | Knight limb counter | GMCP AB files
I don't know that it's explicitly stated anywhere (so it's never mattered). But according to Mithraea's former order the sun rises in the east and sets in the west.
No. It's the type of thing that you could apply in theory, "If the world is this shape and rotates in this way, therefore Zanzibaar must see sunrise before Tapoa, and if..." But in practise there are no timezones.
@Tahquil I respect your opinion! It's even pretty valid. I just like the idea of having a named weapon and, if the admin don't mind what I have in mind, I'm going to go through with that. It certainly doesn't bother me on a personal level if you think I'm being vain. I probably am. But it seems to me that's human nature. People are technically being vain every time they put on makeup or buy clothes that they think flatters their figure, but as far as I'm concerned, more power to them.
I just don't see it as hurting anyone and, if it REALLY does bother people, well... There -are- means to change it.
Results of disembowel testing | Knight limb counter | GMCP AB files
And 'planet' typically implies spherical.
Lightning-quick, you jab Anedhel's right leg with a fucking scimitar.
You slash into Anedhel's right leg with another fucking scimitar.
Funnily enough, when Meropis first came out, the surrounding waters were bugged and surveyed as the Borean Ocean. That was also used to argue the world is round (i.e., that from south of Sapience, Meropis wrapped all the way around the planet, back to north of Sapience).
got gud