Howdy, Stranger!
Categories
- 6.2K All Categories
- 3.1K Everything Achaea
- 1.5K North of Thera
- 26 Archives of the Terraformer
- 257 The Matsuhama Arena
- 885 The Golden Dais of Creation
- 299 The Scarlattan Theatre
- 149 The Blank Canvas
- 2K Getting Help
- 412 General Questions
- 258 Quick Class Questions
- 1.3K Tech Support
- 313 Client Help
- 486 Curing Systems and Scripts
- 841 Off-Topic
- 255 The Wander Inn
- 586 The Universal Membrane
- 298 Class Discussions
- 298 Individual Class Sections
- 20 Alchemist
- 9 Apostate
- 30 Blademaster
- 9 Depthswalker
- 14 Druid
- 4 Infernal
- 20 Jester
- 19 Magi
- 34 Monk
- 11 Occultist
- 8 Paladin
- 7 Priest
- 29 Runewarden
- 18 Sentinel
- 26 Serpent
- 20 Shaman
- 9 Sylvan
Comments
you're given 2 trade skills by default, one at lv 30, the second at lv 50. Subsequent trade skills come at 50 credits each and take more lessons to master.
What happens if, say, you picked your 2 trade skills, didn't put any lessons into them and decided to pick a different trade skill instead? Can you just forget the first two skills and then replace them with something else? There's no additional lesson penalty right?
What about if say... you learned gathering (1st), cooking (2nd) and tailoring (3rd). You decided to give up gathering (which was your first tradeskill, earned by level and at the default lesson cost), what would the cost be like for learning a different trade skill after that?
Like helmets, coifs, pauldrons, gauntlets, etc?
No combat benefit. Just looks cool, same descriptors and everything.
@Sarapis
It's similarly wrong for training to ever be the first of two descriptors, but that's entirely the smith's fault if it happens, not the game's.
Results of disembowel testing | Knight limb counter | GMCP AB files
"Training weapon" is a noun-noun compound, not an adjective and a noun.
Just as a sanity check, I did a corpus search in COCA and I'm not even sure I would say "with the comma, 'training' is something the weapon is doing" (though that's my intuition about what it would mean) so much as I would say that people just don't ever write "[adj], training [noun]" for any reason. There are maybe one or two attestations in the entire 450 million word corpus of "training" followed by a noun and preceded by an adjective with a comma after it.
You should typo this.
A comma would be necessary when saying something like "a mediocre, training athlete." (Because the athlete is mediocre and training.)
But yes, "training [noun]" is in most instances a compound noun, like "golden retriever" or "magnifying glass," and should not preceded by a comma.
Both "large, golden retriever" and "broken, magnifying glass" have incorrectly used a comma.
Either way, there definitely shouldn't be a comma there. Or in your other examples (are those actually in the game? "Broken, magnifying glass" is atrocious).
This all day everyday. Its gonna be ok guys just let it go. It's still weird to me that you guys are arguing about it. I've heard training used as both a noun and an adjective my whole life.
But "training sword" is unquestionably, demonstrably a compound (this is why, for instance, the phrasal stress ends up on "training" and not on "sword"). It's a small thing, but there definitely shouldn't be a comma before it if it's preceded by an adjective.
Uhh, to be pedantic, there is always a situation where the comma can be correct.
"A large, training sword" is correct if you're talking about a large, sentient sword that is training itself to do something.
Album of Bluef during her time in Achaea
Cause you can also see people who are either off-plane or writing in something
Thank you! It's tested and it's broke! Veil and gem are completely negated if the owner of those two items has a trade skill.
Artemis says, "You are so high maintenance, Tharvis, gosh."
Tecton says, "It's still your fault, Tharvis."
FIX INCOMING
@Czanthria @Kuy