UUC starts going crazy about recent changes again, doing my best to both answer questions and calm people down with reason and logic, while offering some ideas to divert them from said problems, all of which I'm doing while finishing a ship trade. In the middle of all of that...
You just received message #5309 from Tecton.
Message #5309 Sent by Tecton 2/22/1:05 You're the island of sanity in the storm!
:x
And I love too Be still, my indelible friend That love soon might end You are unbreaking And be known in its aching Though quaking Shown in this shaking Though crazy Lately of my wasteland, baby That's just wasteland, baby
Hilkiah arrives from the northeast. Hilkiah says to you, "Would you like to join Cyrene?"
.. This novice, I swear, has balls. So, like the typical Mhaldorian, I tell him to walk away before he can't walk at all.
Hilkiah says, "Would you guys harm a poor novice like myself?" Alynna says in a cold, elegant voice, "You know the answer to that question, child." Hilkiah says, "You guys... are "Ruth"-Less."
I lol'd.
"Mummy, I'm hungry, but there's no one to eat! :C"
They really, really, need to show who hired, in game. It's entirely possible for people to just anonymously hire marks a thousand times in a row, without cause, with zero consequence.
They really, really, need to show who hired, in game. It's entirely possible for people to just anonymously hire marks a thousand times in a row, without cause, with zero consequence.
ANNOUNCE NEWS #4055 Date: 02/21/2014 at 22:49 From: Tecton, the Terraformer To : Everyone Subj: Marks and Contracts
[...]
* A hirer may only take out one contract on a target at a time. A hirer may have up to five active contracts at a time.
[...]
* All contracts require a reason to be specified when requesting a contract. This is shown to the victim upon successful completion of the task, and used by the Administration in the event of any issues arising. The Mark never sees the reason.
[...]
* The hirer is now kept anonymous from the Mark, and vice-versa, until completion of the contract, when all involved parties will be notified.
-----
John can hire on Bob ONCE. He needs to give a reason.
Mark is given the contract. He knows he needs to kill Bob, but he doesn't know about John.
Mark kills Bob. Mark and Bob become aware of John's identity. Bob is also shown the reason John gave. If John's reason is not acceptable, the Admin can look into it.
Not worth responding to Shecks anymore. He doesn't read half of what people write, cherry picks and twists information and then just straight up lies about things.
Do you argue just for the sake of arguing? Or are you -actually- an idiot?
I already know the answer, but I like surprises.
@Cynlael Let's try to join the Shecks gangbang without also calling him names, k? Just insult to injury. And since he injures and insults himself on his own merits you don't really have to take it that extra level and cross the abuse line.
I like my steak like I like my Magic cards: mythic rare.
Do you argue just for the sake of arguing? Or are you -actually- an idiot?
I already know the answer, but I like surprises.
I dislike having to be the voice of reason (or, at least, what I perceive to be reasonable), but:
This post just blatantly crossed into an attack on the logic of Sheck's post into an attack on his person - which has a very clear, visible line that, if crossed, really is deserving of an abuse flag. Not for the one insult in itself, but these types of posts tend to escalate into a fiasco where willing people jump into a bandwagon determined to attack this single individual or group of individuals.
I am not quite sure if you're attempting to convey that you're operating from a point of levelheadedness against Sheck's outcries and complaints, or if you're simply attempting to once again be that "troll" you value possessing the title of - but nonetheless, disregarding how disappointing the target of your wrath may be, falling down to his level is most certainly a victory of his behalf. If you do not care about "winning" in this battle of belittling each other, than that is fine - but I would suggest you take care in restraining yourself, or you become the vice that you are attempting to ridicule. You certainly already have, in my eyes.
This doesn't particularly go for you, but I address this to all of those who constantly whinge on Shecks's posts. Whether his posts disgust you, are repulsive, illogical, and are in general ridiculous - that is your opinion, and you are entitled to it. I wouldn't suggest you begin moving such thoughts to the actual person, or at least expose them in a public form, however, since this creates an atmosphere on the forums that isn't particularly amicable.
Not that forums are amicable in general, and I no doubt am addressing a lost cause here, but that post really irked me.
You bet it is, here is another gay one for you sugar.
Disclaimer: Names have been edited for my personal enjoyment and do not represent the person of which they are evoking. Parental guidance is recommended.
(Project 9): Not Silas says, "Shards..."
(Project 9): Not Silas says, "Beg for them..."
(Project 9): You say, "Like your dad begged me to stop last night Not Silas?"
Comments
@Tunnak
I always suspected Cooper
- Mathonwy
You just received message #5309 from Tecton.
Message #5309 Sent by Tecton
2/22/1:05 You're the island of sanity in the storm!
:x
That love soon might end You are unbreaking
And be known in its aching Though quaking
Shown in this shaking Though crazy
Lately of my wasteland, baby That's just wasteland, baby
Hilkiah says to you, "Would you like to join Cyrene?"
.. This novice, I swear, has balls. So, like the typical Mhaldorian, I tell him to walk away before he can't walk at all.
Hilkiah says, "Would you guys harm a poor novice like myself?"
Alynna says in a cold, elegant voice, "You know the answer to that question, child."
Hilkiah says, "You guys... are "Ruth"-Less."
I lol'd.
"Slowly disappear. Never really here."
I knew I didn't have the dumb that day.
- Mathonwy
Date: 02/21/2014 at 22:49
From: Tecton, the Terraformer
To : Everyone
Subj: Marks and Contracts
[...]
* A hirer may only take out one contract on a target at a time. A hirer may have up to five active contracts at a time.
[...]
* All contracts require a reason to be specified when requesting a contract. This is shown to the victim upon successful completion of the task, and used by the Administration in the event of any issues arising. The Mark never sees the reason.
[...]
* The hirer is now kept anonymous from the Mark, and vice-versa, until completion of the contract, when all involved parties will be notified.
@Cynlael Let's try to join the Shecks gangbang without also calling him names, k? Just insult to injury. And since he injures and insults himself on his own merits you don't really have to take it that extra level and cross the abuse line.
I dislike having to be the voice of reason (or, at least, what I perceive to be reasonable), but:
This post just blatantly crossed into an attack on the logic of Sheck's post into an attack on his person - which has a very clear, visible line that, if crossed, really is deserving of an abuse flag. Not for the one insult in itself, but these types of posts tend to escalate into a fiasco where willing people jump into a bandwagon determined to attack this single individual or group of individuals.
I am not quite sure if you're attempting to convey that you're operating from a point of levelheadedness against Sheck's outcries and complaints, or if you're simply attempting to once again be that "troll" you value possessing the title of - but nonetheless, disregarding how disappointing the target of your wrath may be, falling down to his level is most certainly a victory of his behalf. If you do not care about "winning" in this battle of belittling each other, than that is fine - but I would suggest you take care in restraining yourself, or you become the vice that you are attempting to ridicule. You certainly already have, in my eyes.
This doesn't particularly go for you, but I address this to all of those who constantly whinge on Shecks's posts. Whether his posts disgust you, are repulsive, illogical, and are in general ridiculous - that is your opinion, and you are entitled to it. I wouldn't suggest you begin moving such thoughts to the actual person, or at least expose them in a public form, however, since this creates an atmosphere on the forums that isn't particularly amicable.
Not that forums are amicable in general, and I no doubt am addressing a lost cause here, but that post really irked me.