However much you can convince some poor sod to pay, I guess. I've heard of desperate people paying 50 credits, but I've always just gotten it done for the comms, no additional charge.
Hard to justify spending 50 credits just to allow you to spend even more credits on rondels and paragons. Ew.
@Farrah in return though, you kinda have to consider how much time/gold was spent on hitting legend smith. Only giving comms is seriously ripping off the smith.
I paid 50cr for my first embrasure, but there are active people who will do it for free if you look hard enough. Ask people around in game. Turn it into an RP point of searching the realms for a legendary smith. Look for people who might know someone. Try each city.
You don't hire for free. You shouldn't get your shit embrasured for free either. Even if someone does it for free, you should definitely give them a fat tip.
Is there a way to check how many credits I've purchased this month for the promotion? Thinking about buying another package, but only if it puts me on an extra piece.
I paid 50cr for my first embrasure, but there are active people who will do it for free if you look hard enough. Ask people around in game. Turn it into an RP point of searching the realms for a legendary smith. Look for people who might know someone. Try each city.
I figure that I'm dropping 1000 credits on the SoA paragon and another 350 on the rondel. At that point why bother quibbling about another ~30-50 or so?
I paid 50cr for my first embrasure, but there are active people who will do it for free if you look hard enough. Ask people around in game. Turn it into an RP point of searching the realms for a legendary smith. Look for people who might know someone. Try each city.
TRADEWHO ARMOURSMITH or something works too
This doesn't show people with a gem. Or maybe a veil. Either way, it doesn't show everyone!
Wasn't there a way to test out artifacts in the Arena to help you decide about making a purchase? If this is still a thing, how do I go about doing it?
Did we have to do anything with our raffle tickets? like... Bet them or anything? I know I had about 10 on CREDIT REPORT but they've vanished now, presumably because the raffle was over.
After a bit of searching through my scrollback, it's unbound credits, @Frederich.
And I love too Be still, my indelible friend That love soon might end You are unbreaking And be known in its aching Though quaking Shown in this shaking Though crazy Lately of my wasteland, baby That's just wasteland, baby
Yet to be announced as far as I know. I'm sure there will be a post up on Announce soon. They may be trying to contact the first winner to see which prize they want, considering second winner gets the one the first winner doesn't take.
So, after having a bug pointing this discrepancy out as a typo closed with "this is accurate", what is the rationale behind the damage stat on the L2 arte javelin being lower than the damage stat on the L1 arte javelin?
So, after having a bug pointing this discrepancy out as a typo closed with "this is accurate", what is the rationale behind the damage stat on the L2 arte javelin being lower than the damage stat on the L1 arte javelin?
That isn't accurate, sounds like someone misread it to me. I've fixed this.
Comments
Hard to justify spending 50 credits just to allow you to spend even more credits on rondels and paragons. Ew.
got gud
Results of disembowel testing | Knight limb counter | GMCP AB files
Penwize has cowardly forfeited the challenge to mortal combat issued by Atalkez.
got gud
I tied someone down and made them do it cheaper for me though.
Hear that @Nicola? I'll happily re-do it all from scratch, no recompense! DDD:
@Devran You can message myself or Makarios if you want to test out an artefact.
@Nicola Are these unbound, or did I sort of get the short-end of the stick?
That love soon might end You are unbreaking
And be known in its aching Though quaking
Shown in this shaking Though crazy
Lately of my wasteland, baby That's just wasteland, baby
Also the announce said 2 bound credits for each ticket so....
That isn't accurate, sounds like someone misread it to me. I've fixed this.