Quick Questions

17071737576407

Comments

  • It seems likely that at least some Achaeans know the planet is round, since it would be difficult (maybe impossible) for navigating with a sextant to work otherwise. That doesn't necessarily mean it's common knowledge though.
  • Given that we always refer to the rings around the planet as rings, I feel like the knowledge is getting spread.

  • edited September 2013
    Sena said:
    It seems likely that at least some Achaeans know the planet is round, since it would be difficult (maybe impossible) for navigating with a sextant to work otherwise.
    But it is difficult to navigate with a sextant!
  • We also have these cool gods that can tell us things, it's amazing how much information about such things They have and are willing to share..
    ~
    You close your eyes momentarily and extend the range of your vision, seeking out the presence of Drugs. 
    Though too far away to accurately perceive details, you see that Drugs is in Mhaldor.
  • OuraniaOurania The Garden of the Gods
    Ships, the moon, tides, stars, Sarapis holding a huge ball of world. I would expect it to be known, but if characters agree or not is the fun of debating in game. I've not had the argument of the world is flat for some time, but then I just kick them to the moon to admire the view (and let it speak for the world being a sphere).

  • edited September 2013
    Ourania said:
    Ships, the moon, tides, stars, Sarapis holding a huge ball of world. I would expect it to be known, but if characters agree or not is the fun of debating in game. I've not had the argument of the world is flat for some time, but then I just kick them to the moon to admire the view (and let it speak for the world being a sphere).
    Yep, all, I appreciate that literally all the pieces of the puzzle are there, but then how long did we have tides and ships on Earth before figuring it was a globe. Was more just wondering if it was common knowledge amongst adventurers. Thanks for all the answers though, they all made me smile :)
    Tvistor: If that was a troll, it was masterful.
    I take my hat off to you.
  • Sylvance said:
    Ourania said:
    Ships, the moon, tides, stars, Sarapis holding a huge ball of world. I would expect it to be known, but if characters agree or not is the fun of debating in game. I've not had the argument of the world is flat for some time, but then I just kick them to the moon to admire the view (and let it speak for the world being a sphere).
    Yep, all, I appreciate that literally all the pieces of the puzzle are there, but then how long did we have tides and ships on Earth before figuring it was a globe. Was more just wondering if it was common knowledge amongst adventurers. Thanks for all the answers though, they all made me smile :)
    Probably somewhat more than 2000 years between the development of seafaring ships (something like 3000-2000 BCE) and the realisation that the Earth was a sphere (proposed by philosophers ~600 BCE, but not really established solidly for a couple centuries after that, I think, and with the first measurement of the circumference around 240 BCE). But the early Mediterranean cultures hadn't been to the moon, or had contact with multiple other planets, which probably makes a difference. You may be happy to know, though, that Eratosthenes, who is generally credited with the first measurement of the circumference of the Earth, was Cyrenian
  • Wikipedia says China was still in the dark until the 17th century.
  • Half tempted to start a cult that says that the Baelgrim Fortress is the exact center of a flat world.

    @Nizaris, let's do this.

  • Aristotle figured it out by the shadow on the moon in a lunar eclipse.
  • NizarisNizaris The Holy City of Mhaldor
    @Arditi: I know that you're joking, but in all seriousness ... sounds like something that should be taken in-game, or at least, in a different thread than this one. Nizaris already does stuff like saying that Sartan is the one-true-God, will refer to other gods with lowercase "g's", etc. I have no problems with Mhaldorians expressing racial superiority.
    image
  • Q: who would win a flame war out of Tvistor and Xenomorph?
    Tvistor: If that was a troll, it was masterful.
    I take my hat off to you.
  • I concede to Xenomorph's insanity.
  • Tvistor's fans would gank Xenomorph so bad.

     i'm a rebel

  • MishgulMishgul Trondheim, Norway
    Xenomorph can't be ganked. You might as well gank the ground.

    -

    One of the symptoms of an approaching nervous breakdown is the belief that one's work is terribly important

    As drawn by Shayde
    hic locus est ubi mors gaudet succurrere vitae
  • How many lessons in weaponry is shatter?

     i'm a rebel

  • I think shatter is either fabled or mythical on the dot. Either fabled or mythical is a dead level of the skill, not sure which.

    So either 900ish or 1300ish.

    image

  • edited September 2013
    I believe it's at mythical but it's been a while since I learned it last.

    edit: Just checked. 99% certain it's mythical, that's where I stopped learning weaponry, no reason I'd stop there if it wasn't at shatter.
  • Sounds like convincing enough evidence to me. Fabled must be the dead level then. I think all the other skills come on a skill level change.

    image

  • If I recall, Decapitate comes at an odd mark between Parrying and Envenom. It's not -right- at Gifted.

  • And envenom is between Gifted and Expert. With 9 abilities and 12 skill levels, they can't all match up but one.
  • TarausTaraus The Gypsy Wind
    Does anyone have info on harpooner trait, and/or know what the increase to accuracy actually is?

  • Lashes have much higher speed. The only time you might want an artefact whip instead is if you need the higher accuracy, otherwise a lash is far better. They're basically a properly-priced replacement for the whip of taming, since it was changed to be unusable with garrote.

    There's no forged equivalent.
  • Does firelash damage scale with increased Elementalism?
  • Sena said:
    Lashes have much higher speed. The only time you might want an artefact whip instead is if you need the higher accuracy, otherwise a lash is far better.
    I can't check the numbers right now, but I remember something like a level 1 whip being better than a level 1 lash, dps-wise, while from level 2 onwards, the lash wins hands-down. Of course, level 1 whip/lash are both still worse than a lot of the forged whips you can find for quite cheap in many shops, so there's rarely a good reason for buying them. Still, I guess if you wanted an artie whip/lash simply for the convenience of the non-decay, but couldn't afford a level 2, a level 1 whip would be a valid option.

    This of course also assumes that you're at a level where you aren't critting overly much. The higher the crit rate, the more useful the lashes become in comparison to the whips.
  • Iocun said:
    I can't check the numbers right now, but I remember something like a level 1 whip being better than a level 1 lash, dps-wise
     A level 1 whip gives marginally better DPS (1-2 points higher), but the lash is 0.4s faster.

    I agree that it's not worth buying a level 1 of either except for customisation/non-decay, that's true of any forgeable weapons.
Sign In or Register to comment.