This may very well be a bad idea, and if so, I apologize in advance for wasting forum space. I am not too proud to admit that I have those on occasion!
It would be nice to have some sort of system that would flag a person open pk. In the past, some players used to join mark just to open themselves to random pk. This is obviously not what was intended with the mark system.
Thoughts?
Give us -real- shop logs! Not another misinterpretation of features we ask for, turned into something that either doesn't help at all, or doesn't remotely resemble what we wanted to begin with.
Thanks!
Current position of some of the playerbase, instead of expressing a desire to fix problems:
Vhaynna: "Honest question - if you don't like Achaea or the current admin, why do you even bother playing?"
0
Comments
You can't follow Lusternia playstyle, and just go kill someone for being an enemy of your city, then get away with it. Unless of course they've been causing shit in your city recently.
Penwize has cowardly forfeited the challenge to mortal combat issued by Atalkez.
And you won't understand the cause of your grief...
...But you'll always follow the voices beneath.
Penwize has cowardly forfeited the challenge to mortal combat issued by Atalkez.
I believe city soldiers should always be open pk while inside of a city, home city especially. I also hate it when a non participant or non comm accidentally gets killed in a skirmish, which opens someone up to a potential likely upheld bullshit issue. Non coms get especially venomous about this type of stuff and when someone is lingering in an area where a battle is taking place sometimes shit happens. Unfortunately, any type of system I can think of, like a way to indemnify of whatever which I believe already exists, would ruin anything that happens on the fly.
That would just mean city soldiers can't relax on their cities without worrying about someone else who might be bored trying to jump them again and again.
And you won't understand the cause of your grief...
...But you'll always follow the voices beneath.
This isn't 2009 where everyone is grief-hungry. We're all pretty good about doing our business and moving on. I duel Marks all the time, and it's never griefy or anything like that.
Usually falls back on how you treat people, in regards to how you get treated.
Penwize has cowardly forfeited the challenge to mortal combat issued by Atalkez.
- With sharp, crackling tones, Kyrra tells you, "The ladies must love you immensely."
- (Eleusian Ranger Techs): Savira says, "Most of the hard stuff seem to have this built in code like: If adventurer_hitting_me = "Sarathai" then send("terminate and selfdestruct")."
- Makarios says, "Serve well and perish."
- Xaden says, "Xaden confirmed scrub 2017."
I do sort of wish there were still an option for something more like that. Someone who doesn't care about combat, but wants to PvP can join Mark, suck it up, and take the occasional contract. But your only real option if you want the kind of experience I had is to try to become infamous, which isn't necessarily what you're aiming for and eventually has no real off-button.
I'm glad there's no PvP flag that lets you opt out of player conflict, but it would be sort of nice if there were an easier way to opt in.
Results of disembowel testing | Knight limb counter | GMCP AB files