Yeah but those can exist just from generic trees ... ancient or really really old ones. And re: amber specifically, some living trees in achaea have "beads of amber" on them so that's not even necessarily an ancient thing here
Ammolite would require a whole new animal - ammonites - existing, you can't design stuff out of dinosaur bones for example
Does the typo command work on player-created designs?
Also, if I designed a sleeveless shirt before 'reveal arms' was a thing, how can I get the arms revealed? (I tried resubmitting it a long time ago after the change went through, and they wanted me to change "a black cotton shirt" to "a black, cotton shirt" on the new version and I hate it.) I know that when hoods became a thing, raise/lower hood worked on all my previous hooded designs, so might just have been an oversight.
________________________ The soul of Ashmond says, "Always with the sniping."
(Clan): Ictinus says, "Stop it Jiraishin, you're making me like you."
Typo command does indeed work for player designs, and you should be able to ISSUE ME for the other thing to just get the original design changed.
And I love too Be still, my indelible friend That love soon might end You are unbreaking And be known in its aching Though quaking Shown in this shaking Though crazy Lately of my wasteland, baby That's just wasteland, baby
they wanted me to change "a black cotton shirt" to "a black, cotton shirt" on the new version and I hate it.
This is the second design I've heard of being rejected due to needing a comma between adjectives, something which previously passed muster with no issues. Is there's some underlying reason for this requirement?
As I understand it, black cotton shirt is grammatically acceptable since it refers to the colour of the material. i.e. the cotton is black, therefore the shirt is black (and vice versa). It is understood in the reading. The additional comma just looks jarring to everyone who reads it.
they wanted me to change "a black cotton shirt" to "a black, cotton shirt" on the new version and I hate it.
This is the second design I've heard of being rejected due to needing a comma between adjectives, something which previously passed muster with no issues. Is there's some underlying reason for this requirement?
As I understand it, black cotton shirt is grammatically acceptable since it refers to the colour of the material. i.e. the cotton is black, therefore the shirt is black (and vice versa). It is understood in the reading. The additional comma just looks jarring to everyone who reads it.
they wanted me to change "a black cotton shirt" to "a black, cotton shirt" on the new version and I hate it.
This is the second design I've heard of being rejected due to needing a comma between adjectives, something which previously passed muster with no issues. Is there's some underlying reason for this requirement?
As I understand it, black cotton shirt is grammatically acceptable since it refers to the colour of the material. i.e. the cotton is black, therefore the shirt is black (and vice versa). It is understood in the reading. The additional comma just looks jarring to everyone who reads it.
To be fair, the resubmit was -also- rl years ago at this point. But yes, 'a black cotton shirt' ought to be acceptable.
Also @Dupre , I saw this today in Yggdrasil... there is prehistoric amber, and prehistoric animals to go along with it, apparently. Which is actually pretty cool to me.
Amber-coated Yggdrasil. Stunning amber blankets the locale in a golden sheen, the product of
countless lifetimes of growth marrying every sepia tone from flaxen gold eddies
to near-black streaks of umber. When the gleaming celestial bodies
overhead irradiate the resin, long-frozen beings are revealed below. Monstrous
insects and the skeletons of forgotten mammals are trapped in their last poses;
frozen in a final attempt to make their escape. The interspaced sap warps
their image, causing them to appear gargantuan from some angles and no bigger than a
leaf from others, hiding their true identity from study.
________________________ The soul of Ashmond says, "Always with the sniping."
(Clan): Ictinus says, "Stop it Jiraishin, you're making me like you."
they wanted me to change "a black cotton shirt" to "a black, cotton shirt" on the new version and I hate it.
This is the second design I've heard of being rejected due to needing a comma between adjectives, something which previously passed muster with no issues. Is there's some underlying reason for this requirement?
As I understand it, black cotton shirt is grammatically acceptable since it refers to the colour of the material. i.e. the cotton is black, therefore the shirt is black (and vice versa). It is understood in the reading. The additional comma just looks jarring to everyone who reads it.
I sent an email about that exact thing and have had multiple designs rejected for needing commas that are not necessary. I was told that "a ruffled coral swimming dress" needs a comma. Somebody reviewing designs thinks that all chained adjectives before nouns need commas and they do not. Cumulative adjectives that follow correct adjective order don't take commas, and that doesn't differ between American and British English. It's really frustrating.
Also @Dupre , I saw this today in Yggdrasil... there is prehistoric amber, and prehistoric animals to go along with it, apparently. Which is actually pretty cool to me.
Amber-coated Yggdrasil. Stunning amber blankets the locale in a golden sheen, the product of
countless lifetimes of growth marrying every sepia tone from flaxen gold eddies
to near-black streaks of umber. When the gleaming celestial bodies
overhead irradiate the resin, long-frozen beings are revealed below. Monstrous
insects and the skeletons of forgotten mammals are trapped in their last poses;
frozen in a final attempt to make their escape. The interspaced sap warps
their image, causing them to appear gargantuan from some angles and no bigger than a
leaf from others, hiding their true identity from study.
That's cool
While the planet of Achaea proper never had anything prehistoric, I guess yggdrasil and its new planes and planets opens up "extraterrestrial" materials to possibly work with
they wanted me to change "a black cotton shirt" to "a black, cotton shirt" on the new version and I hate it.
This is the second design I've heard of being rejected due to needing a comma between adjectives, something which previously passed muster with no issues. Is there's some underlying reason for this requirement?
As I understand it, black cotton shirt is grammatically acceptable since it refers to the colour of the material. i.e. the cotton is black, therefore the shirt is black (and vice versa). It is understood in the reading. The additional comma just looks jarring to everyone who reads it.
I sent an email about that exact thing and have had multiple designs rejected for needing commas that are not necessary. I was told that "a ruffled coral swimming dress" needs a comma. Somebody reviewing designs thinks that all chained adjectives before nouns need commas and they do not. Cumulative adjectives that follow correct adjective order don't take commas, and that doesn't differ between American and British English. It's really frustrating.
Incidentally, because I didn't ask about this originally, but were the additional commas requested for the item 'appearance'/short desc as well as 'examined'? Because our previous standard of formatting had designs returned for placing commas in the appearance. IIRC the previous instruction was to, in so far as possible, avoid placing commas in the short desc because of how they appeared in your inventory, room, or when people looked at you.
They didn't want your items appearing like: she is wearing a blue, cotton dress, a bright, yellow hairclip, fluffy, knee length socks, and a crocheted shawl.
I got one rejection telling me to put a comma in the appearance/short_desc, which I know is against crafting guidelines so I rolled my eyes a lot and just resubmitted it as is two weeks later and it went through. I gone another rejection later on a different item telling me that because the appearance would need a comma, and commas are not allowed, I would have to find a new way to write the appearance. (I've seen multiple rejections like this from people in my house.)
I definitely agree that commas shouldn't be allowed in the appearance because it creates confusion when reading lists of items people are wearing. I just think the reviewers should be more restrained when rejecting for multiple adjectives because all they're doing is forcing people into less concise appearance fields. People end up tossing the second adjective into a prepositional phrase after the main noun instead, so 'a twisted rose gold wedding band' becomes 'a wedding band of twisted rose gold,' which is (I think) inferior.
Actually got to disagree with you on that one. It should either be "a twisted, rose gold wedding band" or "a twisted wedding band of rose gold". "A wedding band of twisted rose gold" is indeed inferior. The bottom line, though, is that 'twisted' refers to the band and not the rose gold, so you need a comma.
Other than "a black, cotton shirt" the worst appearance I've ever ended up with due to the Crafters' Guild guidelines was "a bracelet of glinting, ruby, sand grains." Those two designs are both from around the same time. It was RL years ago so my memory is fuzzy, but I think there were new guidelines then that might have been tweaked since, and I'm honestly tempted to typo that design in hopes of it being changed. Or ISSUE ME if that would be more efficient. Substandard examined descs are one thing, but I can't expect people to buy a design with an obviously flawed appearance.
________________________ The soul of Ashmond says, "Always with the sniping."
(Clan): Ictinus says, "Stop it Jiraishin, you're making me like you."
I can't expect people to buy a design with an obviously flawed appearance.
This
People arguing about what makes an appropriate accent and voice, and I'm over here thinking how ugly and immersion breaking terribly worded designs in shops or on people are
I can't expect people to buy a design with an obviously flawed appearance.
This
People arguing about what makes an appropriate accent and voice, and I'm over here thinking how ugly and immersion breaking terribly worded designs in shops or on people are
Like design #17537
"a snow-white, fur coat, adorned with a story"
Wtf. Even the 2nd comma is not necessary
I kind of want to make a crafting guide and post it at some point, pertaining to things that won't keep your design from getting approved but do affect the quality of the results. Sort of like Jurixe's event planning guide, except I'm not famously good at the topic and nobody asked for my opinion about it.
________________________ The soul of Ashmond says, "Always with the sniping."
(Clan): Ictinus says, "Stop it Jiraishin, you're making me like you."
I can't expect people to buy a design with an obviously flawed appearance.
This
People arguing about what makes an appropriate accent and voice, and I'm over here thinking how ugly and immersion breaking terribly worded designs in shops or on people are
Like design #17537
"a snow-white, fur coat, adorned with a story"
Wtf. Even the 2nd comma is not necessary
Message 900 From: Deletus Your design has been rejected because "snow-white," is a name, and, should be, capitalised to Snow-White, as, all proper pronouns.
The comma replaces what would be an "and" in the phrase
"Black cotton shirt" is right because you would -not- say "a black -and- cotton shirt"
"Short, lovely skirt" is right because you -would- say "a short -and- lovely skirt"
The problem with commas in the shortdesc is that when you LOOK at somebody their clothing is in a list that is separated by commas. So a "short, lovely skirt" ends up looking something like "She is wearing a necklace, a shirt, a bracelet, a short, lovely skirt, and black boots." This looks awful because the tendency of readers is to break that list down like this:
a necklace
a shirt
a bracelet
a short
lovely skirt
black boots.
This looks awful and it's why short descs should always be phrased to ignore commas. Alternatively, they could use semi-colons to separate the list, which would also solve the problem.
Anyways, the real problem with "short lovely skirt" is that it doesn't obey the adjective order, which is:
Quantity
Opinion
Size
Age
Shape
Color
Proper identifier/adjective or material
Purpose
That's why "lovely little old Italian restaurant" works but "old little Italian lovely restaurant" makes you sound like a goddamn madman, and it's why a "short lovely skirt" sounds awkward but a "lovely short skirt" is perfectly fine.
The comma replaces what would be an "and" in the phrase
"Black cotton shirt" is right because you would -not- say "a black -and- cotton shirt"
"Short, lovely skirt" is right because you -would- say "a short -and- lovely skirt"
The problem with commas in the shortdesc is that when you LOOK at somebody their clothing is in a list that is separated by commas. So a "short, lovely skirt" ends up looking something like "She is wearing a necklace, a shirt, a bracelet, a short, lovely skirt, and black boots." This looks awful because the tendency of readers is to break that list down like this:
a necklace
a shirt
a bracelet
a short
lovely skirt
black boots.
This looks awful and it's why short descs should always be phrased to ignore commas. Alternatively, they could use semi-colons to separate the list, which would also solve the problem.
Anyways, the real problem with "short lovely skirt" is that it doesn't obey the adjective order, which is:
Quantity
Opinion
Size
Age
Shape
Color
Proper identifier/adjective
Purpose
That's why you "lovely little old Italian restaurant" works but "old little Italian lovely restaurant" makes you sound like a goddamn madman, and it's why a "short lovely skirt" sounds awkward but a "lovely short skirt" is perfectly fine.
I'd note that the adjective order thing works in -most- cases but is not a hard-and-fast rule, and that "lovely, short skirt" is still correct over "lovely short skirt".
Short descs should not -always- be phrased to ignore commas. When possible, yes. But I have "a sleeveless, sea-green dress" in my nds list and no particular regrets about it. While the comma separator for items is a major reason for keeping commas out of short descs, you -can- slip an occasional one in without it looking terrible or mixing people up. Just the occasional one, mind you.
________________________ The soul of Ashmond says, "Always with the sniping."
(Clan): Ictinus says, "Stop it Jiraishin, you're making me like you."
The problem with commas in the shortdesc is that when you LOOK at somebody their clothing is in a list that is separated by commas. So a "short, lovely skirt" ends up looking something like "She is wearing a necklace, a shirt, a bracelet, a short, lovely skirt, and black boots."
Actually got to disagree with you on that one. It should either be "a twisted, rose gold wedding band" or "a twisted wedding band of rose gold". "A wedding band of twisted rose gold" is indeed inferior. The bottom line, though, is that 'twisted' refers to the band and not the rose gold, so you need a comma.
Other than "a black, cotton shirt" the worst appearance I've ever ended up with due to the Crafters' Guild guidelines was "a bracelet of glinting, ruby, sand grains." Those two designs are both from around the same time. It was RL years ago so my memory is fuzzy, but I think there were new guidelines then that might have been tweaked since, and I'm honestly tempted to typo that design in hopes of it being changed. Or ISSUE ME if that would be more efficient. Substandard examined descs are one thing, but I can't expect people to buy a design with an obviously flawed appearance.
Nope. Shape comes before color and material in the order of adjectives (the one @Nazihk posted), so it doesn't take a comma. Would you also put a comma in "a thick yellow rope?" Those examples are exactly the same and it doesn't have to do with whether or not twisted refers to the band or to the gold. Not to try to throw credentials around to shut people down without debate, but I'm an English teacher with a literature degree and 6 graduate hours in grammar and usage. That example does not require a comma.
The problem with commas in the shortdesc is that when you LOOK at somebody their clothing is in a list that is separated by commas. So a "short, lovely skirt" ends up looking something like "She is wearing a necklace, a shirt, a bracelet, a short, lovely skirt, and black boots."
config clothesline on
That's a pretty drastic solution. Adventurers wear a -lot- of clothes. You'd have to scroll up to see all of them in some cases, let alone their description or anything else that's happening.
He is wearing: a durable suit of eastern scale mail a black sniper's jacket a black cotton shirt comfortable black trousers a belt of sturdy black leather black military boots dashing black gloves a clawed gauntlet a silver bow-and-arrow brooch a clawed gauntlet an amulet of lustrous argentine hues
Weapon holders: a serpentine thigh scabbard a studded leather baldric an ebon quiver with silvery accents a slender wrist sheath of black and gold a scorched bone sheath a steel chain backstrap a beltloop of bone shards a dragonbone scabbard a fluvial silver belthook
Containers: a wyvernskin pack a polished glass scroll case a softened leather combat satchel a black knapsack a sleek velvet pouch
Jewellery: 2 earrings of Sinope through your left ear
Misc: an amulet of heroism a threatening, miasmic essence an ivory-inlaid portrait locket a yellowed war horn of cracked ivory a pair of eagle's wings a shimmering orange fire opal pendant of burnished gold
...And that's with the armband and the resist rings hidden.
________________________ The soul of Ashmond says, "Always with the sniping."
(Clan): Ictinus says, "Stop it Jiraishin, you're making me like you."
Actually got to disagree with you on that one. It should either be "a twisted, rose gold wedding band" or "a twisted wedding band of rose gold". "A wedding band of twisted rose gold" is indeed inferior. The bottom line, though, is that 'twisted' refers to the band and not the rose gold, so you need a comma.
Other than "a black, cotton shirt" the worst appearance I've ever ended up with due to the Crafters' Guild guidelines was "a bracelet of glinting, ruby, sand grains." Those two designs are both from around the same time. It was RL years ago so my memory is fuzzy, but I think there were new guidelines then that might have been tweaked since, and I'm honestly tempted to typo that design in hopes of it being changed. Or ISSUE ME if that would be more efficient. Substandard examined descs are one thing, but I can't expect people to buy a design with an obviously flawed appearance.
Nope. Shape comes before color and material in the order of adjectives (the one @Nazihk posted), so it doesn't take a comma. Would you also put a comma in "a thick yellow rope?" Those examples are exactly the same and it doesn't have to do with whether or not twisted refers to the band or to the gold. Not to try to throw credentials around to shut people down without debate, but I'm an English teacher with a literature degree and 6 graduate hours in grammar and usage. That example does not require a comma.
Firstly, the usage order isn't the issue here-- twisted should come before 'rose gold', but it should also take a comma. Secondly, 'rose gold' isn't color and material, just material: rose gold is a type of gold. Because 'rose gold' is essentially a two-word adjective (where 'rose' modifies 'gold' but not 'band') this design is in particular need of a comma between 'twisted' and 'rose gold' to make it clear that that 'twisted' is not just another modifier on 'gold'. The problem could be avoided by moving 'rose gold' to the first space... but then that creates a -new- problem of usage order. Thirdly, being technically grammatically correct is not the only requirement for good usage. Fourthly, either "a thick yellow rope" or "a thick, yellow rope" would be correct... but I would actually lean towards the latter, to make it clear that 'thick' modifies 'rope' and not 'yellow'.
Finally, I'm a professional editor. Nice to meet you.
________________________ The soul of Ashmond says, "Always with the sniping."
(Clan): Ictinus says, "Stop it Jiraishin, you're making me like you."
Comments
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ammolite
The soul of Ashmond says, "Always with the sniping."
(Clan): Ictinus says, "Stop it Jiraishin, you're making me like you."
Achaea has nautiluses tho so you could probably spin something out of nautilus shells/nacre
The soul of Ashmond says, "Always with the sniping."
(Clan): Ictinus says, "Stop it Jiraishin, you're making me like you."
Ammolite would require a whole new animal - ammonites - existing, you can't design stuff out of dinosaur bones for example
The soul of Ashmond says, "Always with the sniping."
(Clan): Ictinus says, "Stop it Jiraishin, you're making me like you."
Also, if I designed a sleeveless shirt before 'reveal arms' was a thing, how can I get the arms revealed? (I tried resubmitting it a long time ago after the change went through, and they wanted me to change "a black cotton shirt" to "a black, cotton shirt" on the new version and I hate it.) I know that when hoods became a thing, raise/lower hood worked on all my previous hooded designs, so might just have been an oversight.
The soul of Ashmond says, "Always with the sniping."
(Clan): Ictinus says, "Stop it Jiraishin, you're making me like you."
That love soon might end You are unbreaking
And be known in its aching Though quaking
Shown in this shaking Though crazy
Lately of my wasteland, baby That's just wasteland, baby
As I understand it, black cotton shirt is grammatically acceptable since it refers to the colour of the material. i.e. the cotton is black, therefore the shirt is black (and vice versa). It is understood in the reading. The additional comma just looks jarring to everyone who reads it.
@Nicola
Also @Dupre , I saw this today in Yggdrasil... there is prehistoric amber, and prehistoric animals to go along with it, apparently. Which is actually pretty cool to me.
Stunning amber blankets the locale in a golden sheen, the product of countless
lifetimes of growth marrying every sepia tone from flaxen gold eddies to
near-black streaks of umber. When the gleaming celestial bodies overhead
irradiate the resin, long-frozen beings are revealed below. Monstrous insects
and the skeletons of forgotten mammals are trapped in their last poses; frozen
in a final attempt to make their escape. The interspaced sap warps their image,
causing them to appear gargantuan from some angles and no bigger than a leaf
from others, hiding their true identity from study.
The soul of Ashmond says, "Always with the sniping."
(Clan): Ictinus says, "Stop it Jiraishin, you're making me like you."
The comma replaces what would be an "and" in the phrase
"Black cotton shirt" is right because you would -not- say "a black -and- cotton shirt"
"Short, lovely skirt" is right because you -would- say "a short -and- lovely skirt"
While the planet of Achaea proper never had anything prehistoric, I guess yggdrasil and its new planes and planets opens up "extraterrestrial" materials to possibly work with
They didn't want your items appearing like: she is wearing a blue, cotton dress, a bright, yellow hairclip, fluffy, knee length socks, and a crocheted shawl.
The soul of Ashmond says, "Always with the sniping."
(Clan): Ictinus says, "Stop it Jiraishin, you're making me like you."
I definitely agree that commas shouldn't be allowed in the appearance because it creates confusion when reading lists of items people are wearing. I just think the reviewers should be more restrained when rejecting for multiple adjectives because all they're doing is forcing people into less concise appearance fields. People end up tossing the second adjective into a prepositional phrase after the main noun instead, so 'a twisted rose gold wedding band' becomes 'a wedding band of twisted rose gold,' which is (I think) inferior.
Other than "a black, cotton shirt" the worst appearance I've ever ended up with due to the Crafters' Guild guidelines was "a bracelet of glinting, ruby, sand grains." Those two designs are both from around the same time. It was RL years ago so my memory is fuzzy, but I think there were new guidelines then that might have been tweaked since, and I'm honestly tempted to typo that design in hopes of it being changed. Or ISSUE ME if that would be more efficient. Substandard examined descs are one thing, but I can't expect people to buy a design with an obviously flawed appearance.
The soul of Ashmond says, "Always with the sniping."
(Clan): Ictinus says, "Stop it Jiraishin, you're making me like you."
People arguing about what makes an appropriate accent and voice, and I'm over here thinking how ugly and immersion breaking terribly worded designs in shops or on people are
Like design #17537
"a snow-white, fur coat, adorned with a story"
Wtf. Even the 2nd comma is not necessary
The soul of Ashmond says, "Always with the sniping."
(Clan): Ictinus says, "Stop it Jiraishin, you're making me like you."
Your design has been rejected because "snow-white," is a name, and, should be, capitalised to Snow-White, as, all proper pronouns.
- a necklace
- a shirt
- a bracelet
- a short
- lovely skirt
- black boots.
This looks awful and it's why short descs should always be phrased to ignore commas. Alternatively, they could use semi-colons to separate the list, which would also solve the problem.Anyways, the real problem with "short lovely skirt" is that it doesn't obey the adjective order, which is:
- Quantity
- Opinion
- Size
- Age
- Shape
- Color
- Proper identifier/adjective or material
- Purpose
That's why "lovely little old Italian restaurant" works but "old little Italian lovely restaurant" makes you sound like a goddamn madman, and it's why a "short lovely skirt" sounds awkward but a "lovely short skirt" is perfectly fine.Short descs should not -always- be phrased to ignore commas. When possible, yes. But I have "a sleeveless, sea-green dress" in my nds list and no particular regrets about it. While the comma separator for items is a major reason for keeping commas out of short descs, you -can- slip an occasional one in without it looking terrible or mixing people up. Just the occasional one, mind you.
The soul of Ashmond says, "Always with the sniping."
(Clan): Ictinus says, "Stop it Jiraishin, you're making me like you."
Whereas you would not say "a twisted AND rose gold wedding band", so no comma (You WOULD say "a twisted, yellow wedding band")
Rose gold is a noun adjunct while yellow is staunchly an adjective so they will not necessarily be treated comparibly
a durable suit of eastern scale mail
a black sniper's jacket
a black cotton shirt
comfortable black trousers
a belt of sturdy black leather
black military boots
dashing black gloves
a clawed gauntlet
a silver bow-and-arrow brooch
a clawed gauntlet
an amulet of lustrous argentine hues
a serpentine thigh scabbard
a studded leather baldric
an ebon quiver with silvery accents
a slender wrist sheath of black and gold
a scorched bone sheath
a steel chain backstrap
a beltloop of bone shards
a dragonbone scabbard
a fluvial silver belthook
a wyvernskin pack
a polished glass scroll case
a softened leather combat satchel
a black knapsack
a sleek velvet pouch
2 earrings of Sinope through your left ear
an amulet of heroism
a threatening, miasmic essence
an ivory-inlaid portrait locket
a yellowed war horn of cracked ivory
a pair of eagle's wings
a shimmering orange fire opal pendant of burnished gold
...And that's with the armband and the resist rings hidden.
The soul of Ashmond says, "Always with the sniping."
(Clan): Ictinus says, "Stop it Jiraishin, you're making me like you."
Secondly, 'rose gold' isn't color and material, just material: rose gold is a type of gold. Because 'rose gold' is essentially a two-word adjective (where 'rose' modifies 'gold' but not 'band') this design is in particular need of a comma between 'twisted' and 'rose gold' to make it clear that that 'twisted' is not just another modifier on 'gold'. The problem could be avoided by moving 'rose gold' to the first space... but then that creates a -new- problem of usage order.
Thirdly, being technically grammatically correct is not the only requirement for good usage.
Fourthly, either "a thick yellow rope" or "a thick, yellow rope" would be correct... but I would actually lean towards the latter, to make it clear that 'thick' modifies 'rope' and not 'yellow'.
Finally, I'm a professional editor. Nice to meet you.
The soul of Ashmond says, "Always with the sniping."
(Clan): Ictinus says, "Stop it Jiraishin, you're making me like you."