I'm bringing this one here just for attention. I'm 99.9% sure this shouldn't be this way. While doing an instant that can't be interrupted or it will cancel.... doing setalias or changing curing prios via the CURING command cancel the instant. Seems like something so OOC should not interrupt an instant. If there is something I'm missing here please let me know.
Not strictly a bug, but it should be changed. Commands that can be considered semi-OOC (SETALIAS, CURING, QUEUE) should be excluded from the normal checks for commands. This is already the case for aeon/retardation, and I believe amnesia, but clearly nobody has considered (some) channeled abilities; I'd file a bug and/or classlead it.
Thanks, wanted to check to make sure there wasn't some reason behind it I wasn't thinking of. Bugging now.
(D.M.A.): Cooper says, "Kyrra is either the most innocent person in the world, or the girl who uses the most innuendo seemingly unintentionally but really on purpose."
I'm not sure if the shackle still conveys the damage from running that mass doesn't since this is news to me as well, but in the case of shackle doing it and mass not it seemed to me like applying mass and then wearing/removing shackle dropped mass def. Which may be an unintentional way to not take damage using normal mass and still be able to drop mass whenever.
Every once in a while I have to deal with shop policy nonsense as Chancellor and this most recent time resulted in the discovery of an apparent bug where people were implementing negative policies in order to price items above the 999,999 price limit.
The following notes were included: will be live soon : shop policies will no longer allow prices to exceed 999,999 gold.
Figured I'd leave this here for folks as an FYI.
(D.M.A.): Cooper says, "Kyrra is either the most innocent person in the world, or the girl who uses the most innuendo seemingly unintentionally but really on purpose."
Every once in a while I have to deal with shop policy nonsense as Chancellor and this most recent time resulted in the discovery of an apparent bug where people were implementing negative policies in order to price items above the 999,999 price limit.
The following notes were included: will be live soon : shop policies will no longer allow prices to exceed 999,999 gold.
Figured I'd leave this here for folks as an FYI.
Bug abusers need to go leafy for a while with more regularity, especially repeat offenders.
Tharos, the Announcer of Delos shouts, "It's near the end of the egghunt and I still haven't figured out how to pronounce Clean-dat-hoo."
Every once in a while I have to deal with shop policy nonsense as Chancellor and this most recent time resulted in the discovery of an apparent bug where people were implementing negative policies in order to price items above the 999,999 price limit.
The following notes were included: will be live soon : shop policies will no longer allow prices to exceed 999,999 gold.
Figured I'd leave this here for folks as an FYI.
The Divine voice of Someone Powerful echoes in your head, "The shop prices change is now active."
(D.M.A.): Cooper says, "Kyrra is either the most innocent person in the world, or the girl who uses the most innuendo seemingly unintentionally but really on purpose."
Every once in a while I have to deal with shop policy nonsense as Chancellor and this most recent time resulted in the discovery of an apparent bug where people were implementing negative policies in order to price items above the 999,999 price limit.
The following notes were included: will be live soon : shop policies will no longer allow prices to exceed 999,999 gold.
Figured I'd leave this here for folks as an FYI.
Bug abusers need to go leafy for a while with more regularity, especially repeat offenders.
Not really sure what the issue is with pricing above 999,999. Definitely doesn't seem like bug abuse worthy of shrubbing.
Every once in a while I have to deal with shop policy nonsense as Chancellor and this most recent time resulted in the discovery of an apparent bug where people were implementing negative policies in order to price items above the 999,999 price limit.
The following notes were included: will be live soon : shop policies will no longer allow prices to exceed 999,999 gold.
Figured I'd leave this here for folks as an FYI.
Bug abusers need to go leafy for a while with more regularity, especially repeat offenders.
Not really sure what the issue is with pricing above 999,999. Definitely doesn't seem like bug abuse worthy of shrubbing.
Perhaps, perhaps not. Bug abuse is bug abuse.
Tharos, the Announcer of Delos shouts, "It's near the end of the egghunt and I still haven't figured out how to pronounce Clean-dat-hoo."
Every once in a while I have to deal with shop policy nonsense as Chancellor and this most recent time resulted in the discovery of an apparent bug where people were implementing negative policies in order to price items above the 999,999 price limit.
The following notes were included: will be live soon : shop policies will no longer allow prices to exceed 999,999 gold.
Figured I'd leave this here for folks as an FYI.
Bug abusers need to go leafy for a while with more regularity, especially repeat offenders.
Not really sure what the issue is with pricing above 999,999. Definitely doesn't seem like bug abuse worthy of shrubbing.
Perhaps, perhaps not. Bug abuse is bug abuse.
Personally, I think there's a world of difference between "I used a bug to set a price on an item in my shop (that may have cost me millions of gold to buy) above the (seemingly rather arbitrary) limit." and "I used a bug to inject millions, if not billions, of gold into the game economy that shouldn't have existed."
If any form of bug abuse got people shrubbed, just imagine how non-existent the game's population would be, considering pretty much anyone who fought somewhat constantly had command stacking inside of ret/aeon before it got fixed.
Comments
Which fucking sucks if you have certain things on upkeep (such as mass) and want to turn them off mid-way through a disarm.
Edit: Mistyping something will also incur this same penalty. So if you were to do curign off it'd still stop disarming. It's kind of dumb.
But yeah, mistyping a command shouldn't interrupt channelled actions.
Results of disembowel testing | Knight limb counter | GMCP AB files
On that note, it's rare to see an artefact that actually has drawbacks. I like the tradeoff.
Edit: only drawback is not using mass keepup to keep you from timing out. Though I guess with SS that doesn't work anymore
Results of disembowel testing | Knight limb counter | GMCP AB files
EDIT: Though I guess shackle still taking damage could just be an oversight. Will confirm.
I've followed Farrah when she's moved 100 rooms at lightning speed with like 4 rooms tick.
I, not once, took damage from it.
So maybe something is wrong, but I'm not from mass.
He's not. This was changed recently, I just cba to go through the announce.
You don't take damage from mass running anymore.
Penwize has cowardly forfeited the challenge to mortal combat issued by Atalkez.
Penwize has cowardly forfeited the challenge to mortal combat issued by Atalkez.
The following notes were included: will be live soon : shop policies will no longer allow prices to exceed 999,999 gold.
Figured I'd leave this here for folks as an FYI.
Results of disembowel testing | Knight limb counter | GMCP AB files
It's just something the Garden looked at and decided to change.
The intended cap on shop items is currently 999,999. People used an unintended method (bug) to price things outside of that cap (abuse).
That doesn't mean they won't adjust the price cap in the future, though.
Results of disembowel testing | Knight limb counter | GMCP AB files
Perspective is indeed something.