To start off: I won't have much of the way in credits in the beginning, will mostly make small purchases here and there to supplement in-game credit acquisition.
I'm primarily interested in a support-style class, preferably with some capacity to heal allies and self, and a large amount of utility. I would prefer to play in Mhaldor, Ashtan, or Hashan. I likely won't be involved in much 1v1, and real life tends to constrain the amount of time I can spend playing.
0
Answers
Falconry has a ton of useful stuff in it, and Riding gives passive defence bonus when mounted, as well as the ability to block exits with a mount and jump over obstructions.
How do Alchemist, Bard, Jester, Occultist, and Depthswalker stack up in terms of support, utility, and group utility in comparison?
Alchemists can give buffs as well depending if three alchemist have tweaked the orrery that year. They also have a passive room heal tick skill but can't move it like a bard can. Only problem with them is they still rely heavily of primes to be functional. You'll have to buy the primes or take the extraction trade skill.
runewarden - see above comment but be mindful you'll be running through inks like silas through new choir recruits.
i can't speak for occultist or jester other then be prepared to buy a lot of cards and spend a few hours inscribing.
depthwalker was designed to be a bridging class so you'll find a lot of utility in it that was previously factionalised. While most skills are offensive there are a few that are supremely supportive.
have you considered priest, shaman or Sylvan?
Depthswalker, Jester, and Occultist all have tons of utility and support. Depthswalker doesn't have much in the way of ally healing. Occultist and Jester have some. My recommendation would be Depthswalker though. Better flavor than Jester, more fun to play, and not factionally tied to one city like Occultist.
Alchemist and Bard are a lot more limited in the area of support and utility.
I'm not interested in Priest due to the light and righteousness RP involved. Never been big on the "good" orgs.
Same response for Sylvan, though I'd maybe be willing to give Eleusis a shot if it isn't too bad.
And I haven't thought about Shaman much, but I'll look into them as well. Thank you.
@Ahmet @Farrah
I rolled a Depthswalker a little ago, haven't gotten much into it yet. Not sure if the flavor of the class fully appeals to me, but I'll be investing more time to see. Thank you.
@Kresslack @Nazihk
Currently checking out Runewarden, thank you.
And you won't understand the cause of your grief...
...But you'll always follow the voices beneath.
I have fiddled with bard and like it, but oddly my big turnoff was finding out you can use ALL of your harmonics in one room... which, at least to me, feels lazy because you just would want all the harmonics all the time. I prefer runewarden for just this reason as you only have two runes to work with so you need to make choices (even if they're fairly obvious in most circumstances).
I am in the camp though that can't stand jester flavor hahaha. And as someone who typically plays good or good-leaning, I haven't tried occultism yet.