Amusing/Entertaining/Interesting things you stumbled upon on the Internet

1380381383385386432

Comments

  • KayeilKayeil Washington State
                   
       
    What doesn't kill you gives you exp.

  • Kayeil said:
    Yes please to the pug puppy pile.

      animals puppies pugs
    Death by puppies. How adorable terrifying
    You know, that one thing at that one place, with that one person.

    Yea, that one!
  • KayeilKayeil Washington State
    Dortheron said:
    Kayeil said:
    Yes please to the pug puppy pile.

      animals puppies pugs
    Death by puppies. How adorable terrifying
    Dogs (and animals in general) make the world better. If it was just humans, this place would suck. I think my dog would enjoy a puppy pile, too. He LOVES puppies and little dogs, he's very protective and caring so I think the little ones bring out that "guardian" side of his personality.
    What doesn't kill you gives you exp.


  •        

  • edited April 2016


    This says so much about Australia.

     In 1997, while on flight training with his handlers, Corporal Courage refused to cooperate and flew away, not being found for two days following an extensive search. He was charged with being AWL and reduced to the rank of Trooper. He was promoted back to Corporal in 1998.
  • Pretty interesting video.


  •        

    [ SnB PvP Guide | Link ]

    [ Runewarden Sparring Videos | Link ]

  • No one puts Crikey in a corner.
    Torinn Chiragh, Herald of Fire says, "Good, darn it."
    Talamond Averial says, "You are the least charming siren ever."
  • AhmetAhmet Wherever I wanna be
    Svala said:


    jk never seen a bard that plays flute
    Obviously you've never visited Cyrene and seen me standing AFK at CC.
    Huh. Neat.
  • KayeilKayeil Washington State
      
          
    What doesn't kill you gives you exp.

  • MelodieMelodie Port Saint Lucie, Florida
    Svala said:


    jk never seen a bard that plays flute
    You never met Xinna then, who was legit one of the better bards. And evil to boot.
    And I love too                                                                          Be still, my indelible friend
    That love soon might end                                                         You are unbreaking
    And be known in its aching                                                      Though quaking
    Shown in this shaking                                                             Though crazy
    Lately of my wasteland, baby                                                 That's just wasteland, baby

  •                                                                                  
  • I'm just laughing because I saw that same pic in a black twitter thread on Imgur captioned "When bae's dick stinks but you love him too much"

  • KayeilKayeil Washington State
           
    What doesn't kill you gives you exp.



  • Dogfood donation for watching a video!

    Torinn Chiragh, Herald of Fire says, "Good, darn it."
    Talamond Averial says, "You are the least charming siren ever."
  •        

  • UtianimaUtianima Norway and Austria
    Eld said:
    Sobriquet said:
    Is there a reason that passwords with repeated characters seem to be rated as weaker? I could see rating 'aaaaaaa' and '12345678' as weak because someone trying to brute-force a password might try patterns like that first, but I don't see why, for example, 'hannah' would be significantly weaker than any other 6-character string. 

    I agree with your logic, but your example is a name and therefore bad password. See Wikipedia on Dictionary attack:
    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dictionary_attack

  • Utianima said:
    Eld said:
    Sobriquet said:
    Is there a reason that passwords with repeated characters seem to be rated as weaker? I could see rating 'aaaaaaa' and '12345678' as weak because someone trying to brute-force a password might try patterns like that first, but I don't see why, for example, 'hannah' would be significantly weaker than any other 6-character string. 

    I agree with your logic, but your example is a name and therefore bad password. See Wikipedia on Dictionary attack:
    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dictionary_attack
    Sure, but there are lots of other names in the image (charlie, daniel, dexter, rebecca, nicholas, nathan ...), none of which are represented as being as insecure as "hannah". The only passwords I see that are shown at a comparable size to "hannah" are ones with repeated characters like "booboo", "voodoo", "sexsex", "bubba", and various strings of a single letter or number.
  • I'll reply in a bit more detail later as I'm sitting in a doctor's waiting room atm but from a hash checking point of view double characters like the N in Hannah can be easier to crack.

    (Party): Mezghar says, "Stop."
  • SzanthaxSzanthax San Diego
    Eld said:
    Utianima said:
    Eld said:
    Sobriquet said:
    Is there a reason that passwords with repeated characters seem to be rated as weaker? I could see rating 'aaaaaaa' and '12345678' as weak because someone trying to brute-force a password might try patterns like that first, but I don't see why, for example, 'hannah' would be significantly weaker than any other 6-character string. 

    I agree with your logic, but your example is a name and therefore bad password. See Wikipedia on Dictionary attack:
    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dictionary_attack
    Sure, but there are lots of other names in the image (charlie, daniel, dexter, rebecca, nicholas, nathan ...), none of which are represented as being as insecure as "hannah". The only passwords I see that are shown at a comparable size to "hannah" are ones with repeated characters like "booboo", "voodoo", "sexsex", "bubba", and various strings of a single letter or number.
    only 3 total different letters?... daniel has 6 letters but each of them are unique?... maybe?



  • Szanthax said:
    Eld said:
    Utianima said:
    Eld said:
    Sobriquet said:
    Is there a reason that passwords with repeated characters seem to be rated as weaker? I could see rating 'aaaaaaa' and '12345678' as weak because someone trying to brute-force a password might try patterns like that first, but I don't see why, for example, 'hannah' would be significantly weaker than any other 6-character string. 

    I agree with your logic, but your example is a name and therefore bad password. See Wikipedia on Dictionary attack:
    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dictionary_attack
    Sure, but there are lots of other names in the image (charlie, daniel, dexter, rebecca, nicholas, nathan ...), none of which are represented as being as insecure as "hannah". The only passwords I see that are shown at a comparable size to "hannah" are ones with repeated characters like "booboo", "voodoo", "sexsex", "bubba", and various strings of a single letter or number.
    only 3 total different letters?... daniel has 6 letters but each of them are unique?... maybe?
    Yeah, that was my assumption, which is why I initially said passwords with repeated characters seemed to be rated as weaker. 
  • KayeilKayeil Washington State
             
    What doesn't kill you gives you exp.

  • SzanthaxSzanthax San Diego
    Was it?



  • Szanthax said:
    Was it?
    Depends where on the scale between a single drop and Niagara Falls it lies.
    You know, that one thing at that one place, with that one person.

    Yea, that one!
  • Or even her time at all.


  •  Strong, the Force is.

Sign In or Register to comment.