PRESENT: You currently lay an object. You currently lie down. "She lays herself down. He lies on the carpet."
PAST: You previously laid an object. You previously lay down. "Last week, she laid the blankets. Yesterday, he lay on the floor sleeping."
So does lay imply a movement, and lie a state? I always have trouble with lie and lay, but more in the laying - lying choices. That the past of lie is lay is not helping matters.
PRESENT: You currently lay an object. You currently lie down. "She lays herself down. He lies on the carpet."
PAST: You previously laid an object. You previously lay down. "Last week, she laid the blankets. Yesterday, he lay on the floor sleeping."
So does lay imply a movement, and lie a state? I always have trouble with lie and lay, but more in the laying - lying choices. That the past of lie is lay is not helping matters.
To lie is an intransitive verb, synonymous with "to recline". Past tense: lay, past participle: lain. To lay is a transitive verb, synonymous with "to put (down)". Past tense: laid, past participle: laid. You lay sheets on a bed and then lie on the bed. Yesterday, you lay on a bed on which you had laid sheets. Tomorrow, you might lie on a new bed, on which you have not previously lain. The reflexive "lay oneself down" is a confusing example because it's a (correct) use of the transitive "lay" with essentially identical meaning to the intransitive "lie".
@Oceana: Lay/laid specifies a direct object, even if that object is "yourself." Lie/lay doesn't specify an object; it's implied. So -- and these are both present tense -- you would "lie on the couch" or "lay yourself on the couch."
I am lying on a couch. I am laying myself on the couch?
Yes, but the two are a bit different in that case (that is, both are grammatically correct, but the meanings are slightly different). "I am lying on the couch" is true while you are lying there on the couch. "I am laying myself on the couch" implies (to me) that you are in the act of getting onto the couch (rather than having been there for a while). I laid myself on the couch, so now I am lying on the couch.
I suppose that I will also add that I will advise anyone who sends me a message or a tell about their grammar. I already proofread quite a bit for members of the UUC, whether I know them IC or not, so don't be shy. I won't eviscerate anyone for intermittent OOC communication.
My avatar is an image created by this very talented gentleman, of whose work I am extremely jealous. It was not originally a picture of Amunet, but it certainly looks a great deal like how I envision her!
Silas's. Silas' has become accepted usage, but I was taught that it's only correct to leave off the trailing s for possessive plurals. "The Maynards' house," for instance.
The use of just the apostrophe (Silas' rather than Silas's) was formerly standard (given, for example, in Priestly's Grammar, from 1798), but has largely given way in current use to the 's form. The Chicago Manual of Style gives an optional use of the bare apostrophe for words ending in a 'z' sound (such as Pericles', to give an example both ancient and Achaean), as well is in constructions of the form "for _ sake" (so be good for goodness' sake). . Some references also offer the exception @Rovelda mentions for ancient, classical, and especially Biblical names (Jesus', Moses', Hercules'); I'm not sure how common this is. The Associated Press Stylebook recommends just the apostrophe for all nouns ending in s.
tl;dr: Current usage is mixed, but generally seems to favour the 's form. For informal writing, take your pick. If you're writing for publication, find out what style guide the publication in question uses, and follow its recommendation.
Edit: If I contradicted myself between the beginning and end of that comment, it's because I was researching it as I wrote, so give more weight to the references than to my own generalisations.
dual - having two. EX) The fearsome warrior wields a dual-bladed axe.
duel - a fight between two people EX) I do not duel because I am a pacifist.
Bugs me to no end.
ALSO! Improper use of the word 'literally.' I don't care if it is widely accepted, I refuse to sucuumb to the whims of society because they are stupid.
literally - in the strictest sense. Word for word. Actually, without exaggeration or innacuracy.
"My eyes literally popped out of my head!" <--- Ouch. This is wrong. On many levels. The word you want to use here is 'figuratively.'
versus
"Penwize bashes so much he literally beat Achaea!" <--- This is truth. Penwize has beaten Achaea.
One last one for giggles:
"I'm such a whiner and a troll and I'm so frustrated with people hating me I literally quit Achaea last night!" <--- Then why are you still here? GTFO and make good on your statement.
ALSO! Improper use of the word 'literally.' I don't care if it is widely accepted, I refuse to sucuumb to the whims of society because they are stupid.
literally - in the strictest sense. Word for word. Actually, without exaggeration or innacuracy.
"My eyes literally popped out of my head!" <--- Ouch. This is wrong. On many levels. The word you want to use here is 'figuratively.'
versus
"Penwize bashes so much he literally beat Achaea!" <--- This is truth. Penwize has beaten Achaea.
This is true, except (as is often the case) when one's trying to evoke the literal image for comedic effect.
"My eyes literally popped out of my head!" <--- Ouch. This is wrong. On many levels. The word you want to use here is 'figuratively.'
While I agree that using 'literally' as a generic intensifier is frustrating (not because it's "wrong", but because it's a useful word and there's not really a good replacement), the bolded is incorrect. Using 'figuratively' would be very far from the intended meaning.
I don't care if it is widely accepted, I refuse to sucuumb to the whims of society because they are stupid.
It's pretty much inevitable, it's a tradition older than the word "literally". It's happened to basically every word that means anything like "truthfully" (seriously, truly, very, really, etc.), some have even lost their original meaning entirely.
Comments
To lay is a transitive verb, synonymous with "to put (down)". Past tense: laid, past participle: laid.
You lay sheets on a bed and then lie on the bed. Yesterday, you lay on a bed on which you had laid sheets. Tomorrow, you might lie on a new bed, on which you have not previously lain.
The reflexive "lay oneself down" is a confusing example because it's a (correct) use of the transitive "lay" with essentially identical meaning to the intransitive "lie".
I am laying myself on the couch?
I am going to lay myself down?
→My Mudlet Scripts
→My Mudlet Scripts
tl;dr: Current usage is mixed, but generally seems to favour the 's form. For informal writing, take your pick. If you're writing for publication, find out what style guide the publication in question uses, and follow its recommendation.
Edit: If I contradicted myself between the beginning and end of that comment, it's because I was researching it as I wrote, so give more weight to the references than to my own generalisations.
The soul of Ashmond says, "Always with the sniping."
(Clan): Ictinus says, "Stop it Jiraishin, you're making me like you."
A few more from the village idiot:
dual - having two.
EX) The fearsome warrior wields a dual-bladed axe.
duel - a fight between two people
EX) I do not duel because I am a pacifist.
Bugs me to no end.
ALSO! Improper use of the word 'literally.' I don't care if it is widely accepted, I refuse to sucuumb to the whims of society because they are stupid.
literally - in the strictest sense. Word for word. Actually, without exaggeration or innacuracy.
"My eyes literally popped out of my head!" <--- Ouch. This is wrong. On many levels. The word you want to use here is 'figuratively.'
versus
"Penwize bashes so much he literally beat Achaea!" <--- This is truth. Penwize has beaten Achaea.
One last one for giggles:
"I'm such a whiner and a troll and I'm so frustrated with people hating me I literally quit Achaea last night!" <--- Then why are you still here? GTFO and make good on your statement.
It's pretty much inevitable, it's a tradition older than the word "literally". It's happened to basically every word that means anything like "truthfully" (seriously, truly, very, really, etc.), some have even lost their original meaning entirely.