Just spent the last bit of my night reading every single word about the upcoming MUD from IRE, "Starmourn", and I think I'm going to lose sleep until I get to play it.
Been waiting for a decent sci-fi MUD since before I even found Achaea; problem is most are unpopulated.
The lore already seems deep and the races are insanely detailed.
Anyone else already planning on getting into this? Would be awesome to have another populated MUD to play from IRE.
0
Comments
To actually answer the question: I won't be playing Starmourn, unless it works completely differently to the other IRE games in terms of learning skills and obtaining artefacts. I'm not interested in retiring from Achaea, and I'm not interested in investing (time or money) in another IRE game to build up a character from the beginning.
Results of disembowel testing | Knight limb counter | GMCP AB files
Penwize has cowardly forfeited the challenge to mortal combat issued by Atalkez.
My main fear on Starmourn is that it might just end up as 'just another IRE' with a thinly disguised version of the same herb/tree/focus thing that every other IRE I have played have had, and a small playerbase to boot once the initial excitement in the game wears off. If so, I'd rather stick with the two IRE games I currently play, instead of paying to get more of the same. Hopefully Starmourn's creators will try something new with lower entry barriers, especially as far as lesson learning goes, and less emphasis on coding on combat.
But in all honesty, with dwindling playerbases in all IRE, I'd almost rather they merge all IRE games back into one super IRE game instead of making new ones.
To answer the question though, no, I don't see a situation where I'll have the desire to risk an investment of my time or money in a maybe. They've gone belly-up in the past.
Also there's no real solution to the necessity of 'recycling' players. There's no new source of players, it's gone down overall obviously, so any new game is just another avenue through which they can try to get the current playerbase to pony up some more cash. There might be some people here and there who swap over outright, a huge mistake imo, because of the 'shiny' factor but that's just transferring fake money from one fake bank to another. The overall influx is still stagnant.
I don't see how you could viably believe it's a good decision to open up another branch of your business without ensuring a plan for a necessary increase in the highest priority commodity to a game... players.
I completely missed Kythra's comment so basically got ninja'd by my own blindness.
edit: mature not meaning mudsex all day every day. That's why we have Aetolia
But who knows.
And you won't understand the cause of your grief...
...But you'll always follow the voices beneath.
Tecton-Today at 6:17 PM
Otherwise, meh. Too much money to get into it, otherwise.
Starmourn looks interesting. I'll certainly give it a try. But I think its going to be Dead On Arrival. Sci-Fi muds never do especially well. I'd personally rather see the energy and resources being devoted to this new game channeled into Achaea and the other IRE properties, many of which seem to be suffering and chronically understaffed. Drawing away existing players from the games with dwindling bases is spreading the butter a bit thin over the bread.
If Starmourn is to be successful, its going to have offer something unique. Something like Achaea's seafaring system, maybe with space ships. If that "special something" is hidden behind a pay/grind wall the way it is on Achaea, I'm not sure its going to hold players long enough to remain viable. Minia with lasers just ain't that compelling.
The game isn't being released because we have a large player base. It's not releasing because they think they're going to gut Aardwolf or something. Every IRE across the board is losing people, with a very real new player acquisition issue. You're not recruiting people to a MUD in 2017, and those you do end up recruiting will not be in the hundreds.
From my perspective, it seems more of a 'last hurrah' than anything else. MKO is gone, Imperian and Lusternia aren't fielding many people, Aetolia is the strongest non Achaea game and it's peak is like 50-60 people? Achaea boomed because of retirement, but our pop has been pretty consistently going down again after the novelty wore off. Maybe just my opinion, but it seems that way.
The games are flagging, so it makes sense to do something to re energize your player base.
My my concern is the underlying problem won't be addressed, which is the payment model. It's atrocious in comparison to every entertainment option that is available in 2017 and going forward. It was mentioned to me we tried Reddit once, so I looked for that post. Just reams of people complaining about the payment model.
I truly hope Starmourn is different. As much interest in coding as there is these days, I couldn't picture a better place to dip into coding for results than a MUD. Could absolutely play that up, while also offering easy ways to circumvent the 'need' to code. This does nothing if the expectation is for every person to habitually buy things, that are vastly overpriced in relation to entertainment options elsewhere.
Im more than happy to spend a bit on the monthly Elite, and any DLC-esque things 2-3 times a year. I'm no longer interested in paying $150 for a text sword/laser/ship/hyperdrive or whatever.
Thats is my concern for the new game.
Penwize has cowardly forfeited the challenge to mortal combat issued by Atalkez.
To answer the question, yes, I will try it. But I strongly agree with Kez's post directly above this. I probably won't make it out of the tutorial if I look at their payment model/artefacts and it's abysmal.
I already retired once, and have spent maybe $30 on Solnir ever since. I don't intend on spending the kind of money I did on my retiree on any game ever again... much less one where a text sword can be $254.99... for a level 2. If you take a step back and think about that.. ouch. That's more than my car payment.