Howdy, Stranger!
Categories
- 6.2K All Categories
- 3.1K Everything Achaea
- 1.5K North of Thera
- 26 Archives of the Terraformer
- 257 The Matsuhama Arena
- 885 The Golden Dais of Creation
- 299 The Scarlattan Theatre
- 149 The Blank Canvas
- 2K Getting Help
- 412 General Questions
- 258 Quick Class Questions
- 1.3K Tech Support
- 313 Client Help
- 486 Curing Systems and Scripts
- 841 Off-Topic
- 255 The Wander Inn
- 586 The Universal Membrane
- 298 Class Discussions
- 298 Individual Class Sections
- 20 Alchemist
- 9 Apostate
- 30 Blademaster
- 9 Depthswalker
- 14 Druid
- 4 Infernal
- 20 Jester
- 19 Magi
- 34 Monk
- 11 Occultist
- 8 Paladin
- 7 Priest
- 29 Runewarden
- 18 Sentinel
- 26 Serpent
- 20 Shaman
- 9 Sylvan
Alchemist stats
I've done what was recommended and made a few characters with different classes too see which one "feels right" or you know, just fits well with how I want to play.
I just had a question about alchemist. I was told that with knight classes that the diminishing returns on strength meant that it really wasn't worth using race specialisation/traits to go over 14 and that those would be better off being spent in con.
Is that the same for intelligence with alchemists? Would it be better to pick the con build?
I just had a question about alchemist. I was told that with knight classes that the diminishing returns on strength meant that it really wasn't worth using race specialisation/traits to go over 14 and that those would be better off being spent in con.
Is that the same for intelligence with alchemists? Would it be better to pick the con build?
0
Best Answer
-
Vayne
Rhode Island
Alchemists only really use INT for educing iron as far as I know, and its not usually the focus of their offense anyway. Formulation is completely unaffected by stats, and I do not believe homunculi use it either. It helps to have a bit more mana/wp, but CON is definitely more useful I'd say.
1
Answers
... or else I'm just a predictable noob