Sylvan Classleads

edited October 2013 in North of Thera
Alright, not overly happy with these classleads. I have one HUGE problem that I do not feel is addressed.

Artifacts!

Or more specifically, Strength artifacts that were purchased to enhance Thornrend that are now effectively worthless. I understand the intent behind the changes, and overall in the end it may end up being a good thing. I applaud the higher ups for having the forethought to grant a race specialization change for those who had spec'd strength. There may have been some that went with a race with high strength, however, and an abysmal intelligence for that purpose long ago. I don't think this change is very fair to them. After looking at the base stats, I'm not one of them, but I'm sure they exist.
«1

Comments

  • U wot m8
  • Serpents had a very similar change, also you can trade in artefacts.
  • Aldeberan said:
    Alright, not overly happy with these classleads. I have one HUGE problem that I do not feel is addressed.

    Artifacts!

    Or more specifically, Strength artifacts that were purchased to enhance Thornrend that are now effectively worthless. I understand the intent behind the changes, and overall in the end it may end up being a good thing. I applaud the higher ups for having the forethought to grant a race specialization change for those who had spec'd strength. There may have been some that went with a race with high strength, however, and an abysmal intelligence for that purpose long ago. I don't think this change is very fair to them. After looking at the base stats, I'm not one of them, but I'm sure they exist.
    You'll need them for multiclass anyways...
    Current scripts: GoldTracker 1.2, mData 1.1
    Site: https://github.com/trevize-achaea/scripts/releases
    Thread: http://forums.achaea.com/discussion/4064/trevizes-scripts
    Latest update: 9/26/2015 better character name handling in GoldTracker, separation of script and settings, addition of gold report and gold distribute aliases.
  • We'll need dual racial specs and dual traits too

  • KyrraKyrra Australia
    Quite like these. Kind of glad I never got around to buying str arties yet.
    (D.M.A.): Cooper says, "Kyrra is either the most innocent person in the world, or the girl who uses the most innuendo seemingly unintentionally but really on purpose."


  • Kyrra said:
    Quite like these. Kind of glad I never got around to buying str arties yet.
    Although I did buy a guilded page because I didn't think we were getting the race respecilisation. I regret that decision now.
  • Achimrst said:
    Serpents had a very similar change, also you can trade in artefacts.
    At a loss. They changed the mechanics that made an artifact completely irrelevant when there is another artefact that now takes its place. Jest all you want, it's pretty funny when it doesn't happen to you.
  • I'm not sure what planet your writing from but I am in fact a Sylvan. I also bought artefacts for my Sylvan and although I didn't get strength based ones I still find this set of classleads fixed a problem that many Sylvans were having. I am also in your house so I have no idea how you don't know I'm not a Sylvan. As a house we tested the changes which I guess you weren't around for either.
  • Achimrst said:
    Serpents had a very similar change, also you can trade in artefacts.
    Just out of curiosity, what did Dexterity focus replace for serpents that left them with worthless and costly items? I must admit, however, that I'm not sure how FLAY, BACKSTAB, PHASE, DOUBLESTAB, and PICKPOCKET speeds/times/balances/effectiveness were modified previous to the dexterity change, so feel free to enlighten me.

  • Nadiel said:
    Achimrst said:
    Serpents had a very similar change, also you can trade in artefacts.
    Just out of curiosity, what did Dexterity focus replace for serpents that left them with worthless and costly items? I must admit, however, that I'm not sure how FLAY, BACKSTAB, PHASE, DOUBLESTAB, and PICKPOCKET speeds/times/balances/effectiveness were modified previous to the dexterity change, so feel free to enlighten me.
    ANNOUNCE NEWS #3953
    Date: 10/02/2013 at 21:17
    From: Tecton, the Terraformer
    To : Everyone
    Subj: Serpent classlead changes

    We're excited to announce the release of our classlead changes for the Serpent class! Like many of our classes, this is an extensive overhaul, with changes being made to most aspects of the skillset. One of our goals here was to make the class be more reliant on a single statistic, namely dexterity. So without further ado, I present the changes:

    As far as artefacts go you can still trade them in and I won't pretend to know what serpents specialised as before but I am sure they had to re-prioritize as well.
  • edited October 2013
    Achimrst said:
    I'm not sure what planet your writing from but I am in fact a Sylvan. I also bought artefacts for my Sylvan and although I didn't get strength based ones I still find this set of classleads fixed a problem that many Sylvans were having. I am also in your house so I have no idea how you don't know I'm not a Sylvan. As a house we tested the changes which I guess you weren't around for either.
    So what you're telling me is... this didn't negatively affect you. Like I said, it is pretty funny when it doesn't happen to you. And no, I wasn't around for them, I have precious little time when it isn't my weekend to log onto Achaea. I agree, the change fixed the problem that Sylvans were having of PvE vs. PvP. Great. Wonderful. But you're suggesting I go ahead and forfeit 400 credits because game mechanics changed through no fault of my own. That is a terrible suggestion. As for not knowing you're in my house, clearly you haven't made much of an impression on me to be memorable.

    Since I prefer it when people come to me with solutions instead of problems, how about this:

    - Equal value replacement of a Strength artefact for Intelligence
    - If the person has both, equal value trade in towards an upgrade on their Intelligence.
    - If the person has level 3 intelligence and some level of strength, I didn't realize Penwize was a Sylvan and he has is own version of Achaea anyways.
  • @Achimrst I think you're reading into that sentence the assumption that making the class more reliant on a single statistic means that it was previously reliant on a different, or more than one statistic. It could just as easily be the case that it was not really reliant on statistics at all. I, for one, am not going to make an assumption, and am therefore still looking for information.

    I'm sure I don't have to point out to anyone that trading an artefact in at two-thirds of the price of the original purchase when it becomes worthless (due to a decision one had no part in) is not the same as allowing a full refund or a lateral trade of one stat artefact to the equivalent artefact of equal price for a different stat. That's simple equivalence.
  • KyrraKyrra Australia
    Almost all classes were speccing for con for extra tankiness and health without that much penalty for skills.

    It looks like the classleads are addressing that and pushing toward stats which make more sense for classes. It's not inherently a bad thing for the unartied folk and those that do arti it up have some leeway and slightly more balance. Nothing stops a serpent from speccing dex and picking up a +3 con belt for example.

    It never made a lot of sense for my sylvan to be int based for elementalism stuff but viridian damage to be strength based for thornrend. It's nicely condensed with no penalty now.
    (D.M.A.): Cooper says, "Kyrra is either the most innocent person in the world, or the girl who uses the most innuendo seemingly unintentionally but really on purpose."

  • edited October 2013
    Wait, so can they still not prone/break at the same time?  Shield tattoo too stronk

    Edit: Nope, they can now, the announce just isn't clear.  They can now prone a single target after a thornrend if the leg is broken.
  • Aldeberan said:
    Achimrst said:
    I'm not sure what planet your writing from but I am in fact a Sylvan. I also bought artefacts for my Sylvan and although I didn't get strength based ones I still find this set of classleads fixed a problem that many Sylvans were having. I am also in your house so I have no idea how you don't know I'm not a Sylvan. As a house we tested the changes which I guess you weren't around for either.
    So what you're telling me is... this didn't negatively affect you. Like I said, it is pretty funny when it doesn't happen to you. And no, I wasn't around for them, I have precious little time when it isn't my weekend to log onto Achaea. I agree, the change fixed the problem that Sylvans were having of PvE vs. PvP. Great. Wonderful. But you're suggesting I go ahead and forfeit 400 credits because game mechanics changed through no fault of my own. That is a terrible suggestion. As for not knowing you're in my house, clearly you haven't made much of an impression on me to be memorable.

    Since I prefer it when people come to me with solutions instead of problems, how about this:

    - Equal value replacement of a Strength artefact for Intelligence
    - If the person has both, equal value trade in towards an upgrade on their Intelligence.
    - If the person has level 3 intelligence and some level of strength, I didn't realize Penwize was a Sylvan and he has is own version of Achaea anyways.

    Aldeberan said:
    Alright, not overly happy with these classleads. I have one HUGE problem that I do not feel is addressed.

    Artifacts!

     After looking at the base stats, I'm not one of them, but I'm sure they exist.
    Looks like your not effected by this change either. There was a change and it makes the overall class better, if someone has an artefact they would probably do better issuing it themselves to get an answer rather than fighting about it on the forums or crying about changes made.

    As for you forfeiting 400 credits, you bought the damn things it's your fault you spent them and it's your fault they were spent on strength. Game mechanics change in games all the time or do you only play one game?

    As for a solution how about you use the in-game mechanic or I am sure if you cry to someone in an issue enough they will find a solution for you.
  • Achimrst said:
    Aldeberan said:
    Achimrst said:
    I'm not sure what planet your writing from but I am in fact a Sylvan. I also bought artefacts for my Sylvan and although I didn't get strength based ones I still find this set of classleads fixed a problem that many Sylvans were having. I am also in your house so I have no idea how you don't know I'm not a Sylvan. As a house we tested the changes which I guess you weren't around for either.
    So what you're telling me is... this didn't negatively affect you. Like I said, it is pretty funny when it doesn't happen to you. And no, I wasn't around for them, I have precious little time when it isn't my weekend to log onto Achaea. I agree, the change fixed the problem that Sylvans were having of PvE vs. PvP. Great. Wonderful. But you're suggesting I go ahead and forfeit 400 credits because game mechanics changed through no fault of my own. That is a terrible suggestion. As for not knowing you're in my house, clearly you haven't made much of an impression on me to be memorable.

    Since I prefer it when people come to me with solutions instead of problems, how about this:

    - Equal value replacement of a Strength artefact for Intelligence
    - If the person has both, equal value trade in towards an upgrade on their Intelligence.
    - If the person has level 3 intelligence and some level of strength, I didn't realize Penwize was a Sylvan and he has is own version of Achaea anyways.

    Aldeberan said:
    Alright, not overly happy with these classleads. I have one HUGE problem that I do not feel is addressed.

    Artifacts!

     After looking at the base stats, I'm not one of them, but I'm sure they exist.
    Looks like your not effected by this change either. There was a change and it makes the overall class better, if someone has an artefact they would probably do better issuing it themselves to get an answer rather than fighting about it on the forums or crying about changes made.

    As for you forfeiting 400 credits, you bought the damn things it's your fault you spent them and it's your fault they were spent on strength. Game mechanics change in games all the time or do you only play one game?

    As for a solution how about you use the in-game mechanic or I am sure if you cry to someone in an issue enough they will find a solution for you.
    What? That's just hilarious. I'm sure they were bought to grant an advantage based on the current statistics that were governing the class at the time, like most stat ones are. Why then would it be so unheard of to get a lateral move to the new stat artie that now governs the class and why are you so angry about it?

    You better believe that if sometime down the road they decide that knuckles no longer have an impact on Tekura, or that Tekura is suddenly based on CON instead of STR that I would expect compensation on my lvl3 knuckles or my lvl2 gauntlets above a 2/3 trade in value. There is a difference in things being lessened in value and things becoming worthless to their original intent. This is an example of it becoming worthless to its original intent. A lessened worth would be like the mask of lifevision after the talisman of obfuscation came out or the gem of reincarnation when traits were introduced.
    image

  • Draqoom said:
    Achimrst said:
    Aldeberan said:
    Achimrst said:
    I'm not sure what planet your writing from but I am in fact a Sylvan. I also bought artefacts for my Sylvan and although I didn't get strength based ones I still find this set of classleads fixed a problem that many Sylvans were having. I am also in your house so I have no idea how you don't know I'm not a Sylvan. As a house we tested the changes which I guess you weren't around for either.
    So what you're telling me is... this didn't negatively affect you. Like I said, it is pretty funny when it doesn't happen to you. And no, I wasn't around for them, I have precious little time when it isn't my weekend to log onto Achaea. I agree, the change fixed the problem that Sylvans were having of PvE vs. PvP. Great. Wonderful. But you're suggesting I go ahead and forfeit 400 credits because game mechanics changed through no fault of my own. That is a terrible suggestion. As for not knowing you're in my house, clearly you haven't made much of an impression on me to be memorable.

    Since I prefer it when people come to me with solutions instead of problems, how about this:

    - Equal value replacement of a Strength artefact for Intelligence
    - If the person has both, equal value trade in towards an upgrade on their Intelligence.
    - If the person has level 3 intelligence and some level of strength, I didn't realize Penwize was a Sylvan and he has is own version of Achaea anyways.

    Aldeberan said:
    Alright, not overly happy with these classleads. I have one HUGE problem that I do not feel is addressed.

    Artifacts!

     After looking at the base stats, I'm not one of them, but I'm sure they exist.
    Looks like your not effected by this change either. There was a change and it makes the overall class better, if someone has an artefact they would probably do better issuing it themselves to get an answer rather than fighting about it on the forums or crying about changes made.

    As for you forfeiting 400 credits, you bought the damn things it's your fault you spent them and it's your fault they were spent on strength. Game mechanics change in games all the time or do you only play one game?

    As for a solution how about you use the in-game mechanic or I am sure if you cry to someone in an issue enough they will find a solution for you.
    What? That's just hilarious. I'm sure they were bought to grant an advantage based on the current statistics that were governing the class at the time, like most stat ones are. Why then would it be so unheard of to get a lateral move to the new stat artie that now governs the class and why are you so angry about it?

    You better believe that if sometime down the road they decide that knuckles no longer have an impact on Tekura, or that Tekura is suddenly based on CON instead of STR that I would expect compensation on my lvl3 knuckles or my lvl2 gauntlets above a 2/3 trade in value. There is a difference in things being lessened in value and things becoming worthless to their original intent. This is an example of it becoming worthless to its original intent. A lessened worth would be like the mask of lifevision after the talisman of obfuscation came out or the gem of reincarnation when traits were introduced.
    I'm not saying they shouldn't get anything. I am saying that if dude is going to come out swinging against me because I made a comment specifically say and I quote.


    Achimrst said:
    Serpents had a very similar change, also you can trade in artefacts.
    Strength wasn't the only statistic that governed the class. It only effected thornrend and there are plenty of sylvans who do in-fact go with intelligence or constitution rather than strength. If a person buys something they think will be useful for themselves than fine buy it I don't give a crap but crying about it on the forums saying his opinion on the classleads is the opinion of everyone who is a Sylvan and everyone who is a Sylvan was strength based is complete crap and he knows it. Most novice Sylvans go with intelligence for firelash and this I know because I actually train the novices in our house.

    My entire opinion is if you would have read it @draqoom is that they should talk to someone who can actually fix his one problem instead of saying. "Oh I'm so unhappy with the changes because of artefacts" Artefacts aren't even a part of the class they are something you get to enhance your class and your gameplay not something that is inherent to it.
  • @Achimrst I'm sorry that I missed your point somewhere in the midst of your telling someone to deal with it because they bought it after attempting to put them down for stating how it doesn't seem like a big deal when it doesn't effect you, which you admitted it did not.
    image

  • Draqoom said:
    @Achimrst I'm sorry that I missed your point somewhere in the midst of your telling someone to deal with it because they bought it after attempting to put them down for stating how it doesn't seem like a big deal when it doesn't effect you, which you admitted it did not.
    He admitted it didn't effect him either, but sitting here crying about it and than attacking me for making a comment which was not putting him down or attacking him in the slightest isn't the way to get what you want. I said it wasn't a big deal because the person spend the credits on the item, there was never a guarantee that item increasing strength would always be good for his class. Not to mention he said himself he doesn't have the damn artefact.

    So you can sit there @Draqoom and judge what I said all you want but the people who actually have the artefact will probably be more adult about it and say something to one of the people who work for IRE rather than sit here on the forums and attack people for offering a comment to something they posted. You should also probably go back and see who was putting down who since all I said was and I'll quote again.
    Achimrst said:
    Serpents had a very similar change, also you can trade in artefacts.
    Which was met with.


    Aldeberan said:
    At a loss. They changed the mechanics that made an artifact completely irrelevant when there is another artefact that now takes its place. Jest all you want, it's pretty funny when it doesn't happen to you.
    In no way was I making fun of anyone I offered a comment with information that you can trade in an artefact because he said he didn't have one and I also said that Serpents had a similar change with not being dependent on Dexterity since that is what the classleads for serpent were trying to do.
  • @Tecton You da man. E-mail incoming!
  • Solid.
    image
  • Antonius said:
    God, Sylvans are really fucking bitchy towards each other, aren't they?

    @Achimrst: The comment about stats not affecting him was in regards to racial specialisations, which are a whole different thing to strength artefacts. He was (seems to have been edited out) saying that he wasn't specced for strength, but he does have gauntlets to increase his strength, and that he's not happy about changes that make a (minimum 500) credit purchase totally pointless for him, which seems like a valid complaint to me (I'd definitely be annoyed if my gauntlets were suddenly meaningless for my class, since I spent 2500 credits on them).

    Either way, seems like a mess of reading comprehension failure all around, and Tecton was - as ever - awesome in resolving the problem.
    I really don't care and I have spoken my peace on this subject. Cry into a pillow or something as I am done with it.
  • Antonius said:
    God, Sylvans are really fucking bitchy towards each other, aren't they?


    Feel my pain.

    image

  • Wow, reading comprehension went out the window in this thread and Sylvans seem to really hate each other for some reason.
    Naisar said:
    Wait, so can they still not prone/break at the same time?  Shield tattoo too stronk

    Edit: Nope, they can now, the announce just isn't clear.  They can now prone a single target after a thornrend if the leg is broken.
    They can thornrend;swing staff, do you mean? That would be a nice change.
Sign In or Register to comment.