I am unsure as to whether or not this is a critically important combat change and thus should be directed to the ACC, but can overgrowth be changed to being burned by anything (fiery) which can destroy an icewall, rather than just firelash?
Flame totem
Demon scorch totem
Angel sear(?) totem
Breath fire at totem
Please, thank you.
Full Version: Overgrowth
Syntax: ANGEL CHARBROIL <adventurer>
ANGEL CHARBROIL ICEWALL <direction>
With this ability, you may command your guardian angel to charboril an adventurer
with intense heat, causing him to be grilled with a crisp flavour. Alternatively, your angel
can melt an icewall.
ANGEL CHARBROIL ICEWALL <direction>
With this ability, you may command your guardian angel to charboril an adventurer
with intense heat, causing him to be grilled with a crisp flavour. Alternatively, your angel
can melt an icewall.
Yeah, I've always wondered about that.
OMG THAT'S SO UNFAIR YOU'LL RUIN EVERYTHING GO CRAI MOAR NUB IT ISN'T OUR FAULT IT IS COMPLETELY BALANCED WTF IS WRONG WITH YOUOU3923U5925@%@$%!
Now that my required ForumRP is out of the way, good idea, I approve.
Now that my required ForumRP is out of the way, good idea, I approve.
I don't see a problem with this as long as a similiar EQ time is added to the appropriate skills.
Alternative solution - buy a ring of firelash. I'll bring it up over the ACC, though, to hear what the consensus on it is.
There's no need to bring it up on the ACC.
QUOTE (Cooper @ Oct 27 2009, 07:36 PM) 
I don't see a problem with this as long as a similiar EQ time is added to the appropriate skills.
If it only applies to when they're being used to burn away Overgrowth, sure.
Oh, I thought this was going to be something about a passing comment someone said about overgrowth (Delphinus, I think it was). I don't really see much of a problem with this, though it seems to me that my work in Mhaldor is too easily done away with 
QUOTE (Cooper @ Oct 27 2009, 06:52 PM)
There's no need to bring it up on the ACC.
Considering the decision that was made regarding this when overgrowth was implemented, and this same topic coming up on the ACC a time or two, it would probably make sense for the ACC to bring it up with Tecton.
This seems unnecessary. A remedy for overgrowth is already available for literally every class, and if anything, it encourages the in-game economy. Personally, it's the only reason I bothered buying a firelash enchantment.
CC the ACC, though.
CC the ACC, though.
QUOTE (Eurulis @ Oct 27 2009, 07:28 PM)
Oh, I thought this was going to be something about a passing comment someone said about overgrowth (Delphinus, I think it was). I don't really see much of a problem with this, though it seems to me that my work in Mhaldor is too easily done away with
It makes me laugh every single time. It's stylish.
also I am on my third or fifth firelash ring thanks to you, if it helps.
QUOTE (Nulaye @ Oct 29 2009, 04:48 PM)
QUOTE (Eurulis @ Oct 27 2009, 07:28 PM)
Oh, I thought this was going to be something about a passing comment someone said about overgrowth (Delphinus, I think it was). I don't really see much of a problem with this, though it seems to me that my work in Mhaldor is too easily done away with
It makes me laugh every single time. It's stylish.
also I am on my third or fifth firelash ring thanks to you, if it helps.
And its fun to boot! Win/Win
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.