New forum rule - no animated signatures

2»

Comments

  • KresslackKresslack Florida, United States
    Mathonwy said:
    sarapis why ;_;

    Just what in the hell do you think you're doing?




  • edited May 2014

    Say it isn't so! I so enjoyed my animated gif signature of full-movie-length Star Wars Episodes 4, 5, and 6! There is a void in my life now, so dark and empty that three lifetimes of achievements cannot hope to fill it.

  • BluefBluef Delos
    Kresslack said:

    My were usually humerous and witty, but I guess people using gianormous ones gets annoying, especially when they stack them on top of each other. Looking at you, @Bluef.


    I haven't used that signature in over six months, @Kresslack, so I sincerely doubt evil Lady Gaga had anything to do with this new rule. Although she will be missed (then again, I could just un-animate her). 

    My new signature also already complies with the 200 pixel rule. I'm ahead of the curve! Wheeeee!

  • KyrraKyrra Australia
    Will miss @Nemutaur and @Jurixe sigs the most, can spend hours watching them :(

    Also please fix forums. Not bring able to tag on a phone is dumb, the quoting was bad enough.
    (D.M.A.): Cooper says, "Kyrra is either the most innocent person in the world, or the girl who uses the most innuendo seemingly unintentionally but really on purpose."

  • Kresslack said:
    Mathonwy said:
    sarapis why ;_;

    Just what in the hell do you think you're doing?

    JUST BE COOL KRESSLACK DAMN

    Saeva said:
    If Mathonwy is 2006 I wish 2007 had never come.
    Xenomorph said:
    heh. Mathowned.
    Message #12872 Sent by Jurixe
    4/16/0:41
    MAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF.
  • When my connection is slow (it used to be slow all the time, now it's evolved to being slow some of the time) animated signatures can be a huge drag on load time.

  • AerekAerek East Tennessee, USA
    > @Nim said:
    > While I agreed with the limit on signature size, I feel this change is a significant reduction of forum quality. :c

    I don't feel the quality of discussion on a discussion forum is determined by signatures in any significant capacity.
    -- Grounded in but one perspective, what we perceive is an exaggeration of the truth.
  • Signatures are, by their nature, almost never relevant to the discussion at hand, since they are indiscriminately included in every post made by the user, including retroactively. 

Sign In or Register to comment.